ArticleRenal failure2025
Comparative analysis of dietary pattern indices and their associations with chronic kidney disease: a comprehensive analysis of NHANES data (2000-2020).
Article in Renal failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dietary patterns and physical activity in relation to renal and metabolic outcomes among older adults with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- A narrative review of dietary patterns in cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- The interaction between future food considerations, regulation of eating behaviors, sense of purpose, and social media consciousness among college students: a study on mediation effects and network analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Association between triglyceride-glucose index-a body shape index and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and the modification effect of dietary patterns.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Associations between dietary patterns and sarcopenia in aging populations: a community study from eastern China's Huzhou city.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough dietary patterns are recognized as modifiable risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD), comparative evidence on the differential impacts of commonly used dietary indices remains limited. This study aims to evaluate associations between four indices (Healthy Eating Index-2020, HEI-2020; alternative Mediterranean Diet Score, aMED; Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension, DASH; Dietary Inflammatory Index, DII) and CKD risk, and explore their population heterogeneity.
methodsUtilizing cross-sectional data from NHANES (2000-2020), dietary scores were calculated for individuals with or without CKD. Logistic regressions estimated normalized odds ratio (ORs) per 25% scoring range increase. Predictive utility was assessed
resultsDASH (OR = 0.880, 95%CI: 0.812-0.954) and DII (OR = 1.099, 95%CI: 1.025-1.180) were significantly associated with CKD risk, only DII remained associated with CKD severity progression (OR = 1.264, 95%CI: 1.103-1.450). Dietary indices provided incremental utility second to comorbidities and age. Nonlinear analyses revealed that greater adherence to DASH/DII reduced CKD risk, with consistent results across subgroups of males, individuals over 65 years, Non-Hispanic Whites, both smokers and nonsmokers, family income-to-poverty ratio >3.5, and individuals with hypertension or without diabetes and cardiovascular diseases.
conclusionsDASH and DII exhibited superior CKD risk discrimination versus other indices. Adopting dietary habits aligned with DASH/DII was most effective for reducing CKD risk in dietary interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.