ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2025
Detecting actionable mutations from matched plasma-based versus tissue next-generation sequencing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective single centre analysis on site.
Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive modeling of peripheral blood EGFR positivity in patients with advanced primary non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsy in solid tumours: expert opinion paper of the European society of pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Optimization of a hybridization-based target enrichment protocol for precision oncology.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsy biomarkers for cancer detection, treatment monitoring, and clinical outcome prediction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLiquid biopsies (LB) are used increasingly to detect actionable mutations in patients newly diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), though tissue biopsies (TB) still remain the gold standard. The value of systematically combining LB and TB next-generation sequencing (NGS) for genomic profiling in these patients remains controversial.
methodsThis single-centre retrospective study included 102 matched TB and LB samples collected from aNSCLC patients at diagnosis. Four circulating free DNA (cfDNA)-based NGS assays (1-4) were compared on site for performance and concordance with TB to detect ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) I/II. Additionally, cfDNA droplet digital PCR methylation (ddPCR-met) testing estimated the tumour fraction to refine the interpretation of wild-type (WT) results.
resultsOut of 102 patients, 13% had stage IIIB disease, and 11% presented with brain-only metastases. Adenocarcinoma was the predominant subtype (84%). Ninety LB samples yielded interpretable results across the four assays. Positive percent agreement with TB ranged from 56% (assay 2) to 79% (assay 4), with high concordance, particularly for single-nucleotide variants (SNVs). Hybrid capture-based assays (3 and 4) detected eight and seven gene fusions, respectively, while amplicon-based assays (1 and 2) detected only two each. Assay 3 only identified 12 MET amplifications, five of which were confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) but were missed by TB-based NGS. Five out of six negative cfDNA samples with ddPCR-met testing were WT across all assays. The plasma-first approach added incremental value, up to 21% (assay 3). Amplicon-based assays were faster and required less input of DNA for analysis. Patients with stage IIIB or brain-only metastases were significantly more likely to have negative/low levels of cfDNA ddPCR-met.
conclusionsLB-based NGS demonstrated high concordance with TB in newly diagnosed aNSCLC, particularly for detection of SNV. Hybrid capture assays showed superior performance in identifying gene fusions and MET amplifications. The incremental value of a plasma-first strategy was limited in this real-life study. Thus, LB-based NGS on site should be seen as a complementary tool to TB-based NGS or an alternative when tissue samples are unavailable. Additionally, cfDNA methylation analysis enhances diagnostic accuracy in specific cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.