Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40765058›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2025

Detecting actionable mutations from matched plasma-based versus tissue next-generation sequencing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective single centre analysis on site.

Christophe Bontoux, Caroline Lacoux, Jonathan Benzaquen, Jacques Boutros, Guylène Rignol, Elodie Long-Mira, Sandra Lassalle, Maryline Allegra, Doriane Bohly, Mathieu Garcia and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Liquid biopsy in solid tumours: expert opinion paper of the European society of pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Christophe Bontoux *Department of Pathology, Cancer University Institute of Toulouse-Oncopole, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, 31059, France.
Caroline Lacoux *Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Jonathan BenzaquenInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Jacques BoutrosInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Guylène RignolInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Elodie Long-MiraInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Sandra LassalleInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Maryline AllegraInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Doriane BohlyInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Mathieu GarciaInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Christelle BonnetaudInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Olivier BordoneInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Jean-Marc FélixInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Virginie Lespinet-FabreInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Virginie TangaInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Charles-Hugo MarquetteInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Valérie TalyUniversité de Paris, UMR-S1138, CNRS SNC5096, Équipe Labélisée Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France.
Aurélia BaurèsMETHYS Dx, 67 rue Saint-Jacques, Paris, 75005, France.
Simon HeekeDepartment of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Marius IliéInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Véronique HofmanInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France.
Paul HofmanInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire RespirERA, Université Côte d'Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, Nice CEDEX 1, 06001, France. hofman.p@chu-nice.fr.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche #ANR-23-IHU-007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiquid biopsies (LB) are used increasingly to detect actionable mutations in patients newly diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), though tissue biopsies (TB) still remain the gold standard. The value of systematically combining LB and TB next-generation sequencing (NGS) for genomic profiling in these patients remains controversial.

methodsThis single-centre retrospective study included 102 matched TB and LB samples collected from aNSCLC patients at diagnosis. Four circulating free DNA (cfDNA)-based NGS assays (1-4) were compared on site for performance and concordance with TB to detect ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) I/II. Additionally, cfDNA droplet digital PCR methylation (ddPCR-met) testing estimated the tumour fraction to refine the interpretation of wild-type (WT) results.

resultsOut of 102 patients, 13% had stage IIIB disease, and 11% presented with brain-only metastases. Adenocarcinoma was the predominant subtype (84%). Ninety LB samples yielded interpretable results across the four assays. Positive percent agreement with TB ranged from 56% (assay 2) to 79% (assay 4), with high concordance, particularly for single-nucleotide variants (SNVs). Hybrid capture-based assays (3 and 4) detected eight and seven gene fusions, respectively, while amplicon-based assays (1 and 2) detected only two each. Assay 3 only identified 12 MET amplifications, five of which were confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) but were missed by TB-based NGS. Five out of six negative cfDNA samples with ddPCR-met testing were WT across all assays. The plasma-first approach added incremental value, up to 21% (assay 3). Amplicon-based assays were faster and required less input of DNA for analysis. Patients with stage IIIB or brain-only metastases were significantly more likely to have negative/low levels of cfDNA ddPCR-met.

conclusionsLB-based NGS demonstrated high concordance with TB in newly diagnosed aNSCLC, particularly for detection of SNV. Hybrid capture assays showed superior performance in identifying gene fusions and MET amplifications. The incremental value of a plasma-first strategy was limited in this real-life study. Thus, LB-based NGS on site should be seen as a complementary tool to TB-based NGS or an alternative when tissue samples are unavailable. Additionally, cfDNA methylation analysis enhances diagnostic accuracy in specific cases.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLung NeoplasmsMutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorActionable genomic alterationsCtDNALiquid biopsyMethylationNGSNon-small cell lung carcinomaPrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID40765058
PMCPMC12326616

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.