ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2025
Efficient quality control of platelet-rich plasma preparation using computer vision and deep learning.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Growth factor and cell content in Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), Leukocyte- and Platelet-Rich Plasma (L-PRP), Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) in patients with long bone defects from combat injuries.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- The Platelet-Rich Plasma research ecosystem: From mechanistic insights to precision treatment in knee osteoarthritis.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a critical component in regenerative medicine, with applications in tissue repair and inflammation regulation. Consistent preparation quality is essential for therapeutic efficacy, but traditional quality control (QC) methods are labor-intensive, slow, and prone to variability. Aim: We introduce a computer vision-based automated PRP QC model using deep learning to improve the efficiency and accuracy of PRP preparation. Approach: Blood samples were collected and processed in the laboratory to prepare PRP. Images of the samples were manually captured. Medical-grade QC evaluations determined sample quality, which was labeled for model training. The image data were preprocessed and analyzed using a ResNet18 convolutional neural network combined with a binary classifier to develop a PRP QC model. Training and testing were conducted using data from patients, and the model's accuracy was tested on the independent unavailable dataset. Results: The PRP QC model achieved an average classification accuracy of 82.5% on unavailable datasets (previously unseen test samples), significantly reducing the time required for QC to under 1 min. Conclusions: We demonstrate a nondestructive, real-time QC method for PRP preparation with computer vision and deep learning, offering a practical and scalable solution to improve clinical outcomes in regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.