Trial reportHepatic medicine : evidence and research2025
The Effect of Liv.52 DS in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD): A Pilot, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Study.
Trial report in Hepatic medicine : evidence and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Construction norms for the tiered diagnosis and treatment and standardized management center of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026Guideline
- Comparative Efficacy of Herbal Products for Improving Liver Enzymes and Inflammation in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is considered a major global health concern. Considering the preliminary trend of hepatoprotective function of Liv.52 DS, the present study was conducted to explore its role in MAFLD. Patients and Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective, multicenter study was performed at four tertiary care hospitals in India. A total of 52 randomized subjects were administered either Liv.52 DS or placebo tablets twice daily for six months. Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) and Controlled Attenuated Parameter (CAP) values were compared at baseline and 6 months. After completion of the study, data from 47 subjects were available for analysis (31 in the Liv.52 DS group and 16 in the placebo group). Results: The mean LSM score, was reduced from 7.3 to 6.0 (Change From Baseline = 17.5%) in the active group with statistically significance (p = 0.007) compared to placebo group with LSM score reduction from 7.5 to 6.9 (CFB = 7.29%). A shift in the mean value from fibrosis (>6.0 kPa) to almost no significant fibrosis (<6.0 kPa), as per the Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver (INASL) cutoff, was achieved in the Liv.52 DS Group. Improvement was also observed in CAP values with Liv.52 DS, where 71% of the subjects showed an overall improvement in steatosis grade. The other liver markers like alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were within the normal range. There were no cases of nephrotoxicity (common concern for herbal formulation), and no drug-related adverse events were reported. Conclusion: A significant improvement in LSM and improvement in CAP was observed after 6 months of treatment with Liv.52 DS using fibroscan. This suggests that Liv.52 DS should be further explored for its potential role in the treatment of unmet medical needs in MAFLD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.