SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Characteristics and innovative points of clinical trials of radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC over the past decade.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to statistically and qualitatively evaluate the characteristics of immunoradiotherapy (iRT) clinical trials for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov website over the past decade, to help researchers grasp current research trends and design higher-quality iRT clinical trials in the future. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive study of interventional non-small cell lung cancer iRT clinical trials registered from 2014 to 2024. This study focuses on the combination of different radiotherapy methods with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), minimizing attention to new immunotherapeutic drugs. It emphasizes the exploration of radiotherapy and suitable patient populations. Therefore, the types of ICIs are limited to PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors, and the main innovative points of the included clinical trials were categorized and statistically analyzed. Results: As of 24 June 2024, 196 clinical trials were available for analysis. Among these trials, more than 76% of clinical trials focused on patients with stage III and higher NSCLC. About 35.2% of the studies were still recruiting, only 14.8% were marked as completed, and 12.8% had failed, with slow enrollment, safety, and funding issues being the main reasons for failure. Phase 2 trials (56.1%) led significantly, with only 11.7% of trials reaching phase 3; hence, 55.6% had a sample size of fewer than 50 participants. Nearly half (45.4%) of the studies were multi-center trials, and 54.6% had data monitoring. Durvalumab was explicitly mentioned in 30.1% of the studies. Most clinical trials (64.3%) focused on innovating radiotherapy dose adjustments, with 104 studies adopting a hypofractionated radiotherapy-based protocol. Conclusion: The number of iRT clinical trials in the NSCLC field is rapidly increasing. Most patients are in locally advanced stages or higher, with phase 2 trials predominating. Durvalumab is the representative drug, and researchers are particularly interested in optimizing radiotherapy doses, with a tendency to adopt hypofractionated radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.