ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025
Intracochlear Imaging Using IVUS and OFDI: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intracochlear Imaging Using IVUS and OFDI: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluates the feasibility of optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for intracochlear imaging in human cadaveric specimens. We compare their resolution, depth penetration, and ability to identify key cochlear structures and pathological conditions. Methods: Human cadaveric temporal bones were prepared, and OFDI and IVUS probes were inserted through the round window into the scala tympani. OFDI imaging was performed using the LUNAWAVE system (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan), while IVUS imaging was conducted using the VISICUBE system (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) with 60 and 40 MHz probes. The probe tips were trimmed to optimize insertion and imaging. Imaging results were compared with histological sections. Results: OFDI provided high-resolution visualization of the cochlear basal turn, allowing clear identification of the basilar membrane, Reissner's membrane, scala media, and the organ of Corti. IVUS exhibited lower resolution than OFDI but allowed for deeper tissue penetration. The 60 MHz IVUS probe provided higher resolution than the 40 MHz probe, while the 40 MHz probe offered a wider field of view due to greater penetration depth and lower attenuation. Both OFDI and IVUS successfully detected basilar membrane disruptions, a known complication in cochlear implant surgery. Conclusion: OFDI and IVUS demonstrated feasibility for intracochlear imaging, with OFDI offering superior resolution and IVUS providing greater penetration. This is the first study to apply IVUS for intracochlear imaging, supporting its potential role in intraoperative monitoring and cochlear pathology assessment. Level of Evidence: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.