Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40766238›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Denoising of Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Data via Principal Component Analysis.

Soheil Soltani, Jack G Paulson, Emma Fong, Shannon M Mumenthaler, Andrea M Armani

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Soheil SoltaniEllison Medical Institute, Los Angeles, California 90064, USA.
Jack G PaulsonEllison Medical Institute, Los Angeles, California 90064, USA.
Emma FongEllison Medical Institute, Los Angeles, California 90064, USA.
Shannon M MumenthalerEllison Medical Institute, Los Angeles, California 90064, USA.
Andrea M ArmaniEllison Medical Institute, Los Angeles, California 90064, USA.

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Fumito Ito · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
Multiscale systems biology modeling to exploit tumor-stromal metabolic crosstalk in colorectal cancerU01CA232137 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI FINLEY, STACEY DELERIA, MACKLIN, PAUL T · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089NCI NIH HHS U01 CA232137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy (FLIM) quantifies autofluorescence lifetime to assess cellular metabolism, therapeutic efficacy, and disease progression. These dynamic and heterogeneous processes complicate signal analysis. Fit-free analysis methods such as phasor analysis are increasingly used due to limitations of fit-based approaches. However, incorporating photon-counting shot noise often leads to moderate-to-high uncertainty in detecting subtle changes. Common noise-reduction strategies can introduce errors and cause data loss. We developed noise-corrected principal component analysis (NC-PCA), which selectively identifies and removes noise to isolate the signal of interest. We validated NC-PCA by analyzing FLIM images of patient-derived colorectal cancer organoids treated with various therapeutics. First, we show NC-PCA decreases uncertainty by up to 5.5-fold compared to conventional analysis and reduces data loss over 50-fold. Then, using a merged dataset, NC-PCA reveals multiple metabolic states. Overall, NC-PCA offers a powerful, generalizable tool to enhance FLIM analysis and improve detection of biologically relevant metabolic changes.

Indexed as

adaptive noise removaldata retentionDenoisingFLIMFLIM analysisFluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopymetabolic imagingOrganoid imagingprincipal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID40766238
PMCPMC12324588

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.