ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Exploring the aftermath of hematopoietic cell transplantation: 18-year insights into post-transplant neoplasms.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Survival post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is improving, with an increasing number of survivors. Subsequent neoplasms (SNs) following HCTs are of particular concern. Methods: Between January 2003 and December 2022, HCT recipients' records were retrospectively reviewed. Results: At a median follow-up of 108 months (range, 0.13-215), 2659 patients received HCTs. Of those, 1131 (43%) were <18 years old. Allogeneic HCTs were conducted in 1476 (56%) patients. Myeloablative conditioning (MAC) was utilized in 2157 (81%), and 583(22%) received TBI. At a median of 9 years following transplant, forty-three patients developed SNs (1.6%) with a median age at time of HCT of 27.6 years (range, 2.8-64.8). Of those: 32 were males (74%), 20 received full HLA-matched allogeneic HCTs (46.5%), two (4.6%) had unrelated cord blood HCT (UCB), and one (2.3%) received haplo-HCT, whereas autologous HCTs accounted for 46.6% (n=20). Underlying diseases were: ALL(13.9%), AML(11.6%), Hodgkin Lymphoma(13.9%), Non-Hodgkin lymphoma(13.9%), Multiple Myeloma(18.6%), Fanconi Anemia(6.9%), CML(6.9%),Neuroblastoma(2.3%), and thalassemia (2.3%).); cGVHD occurred in (74%), and CMV infection/reactivation in (60.5%). Stem cell source included peripheral blood in (81.4%), BM in (3.9%), and UCB in (4.7%). Conditioning regimens were MAC (81.4%) vs RIC (18.6%). TBI-based regimen was utilized in 14 patients (32.5%). Subsequent hematologic malignancies accounted for 32.5% of SNs. While subsequent solid neoplasms occurred in 65.2%, and PTLD occurred in 2.3%. The probability of 5-year overall survival after a SN was 58.2%. Conclusions: SNs adversely impact the overall survival and quality of life of HCT survivors. In our cohort, the rate of post-HCT SNs was lower than that in the literature; however, longer follow-up of our cohort is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.