Evidence mapPaperPMID 40766819Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2025

Macrophage Polarization in Myocardial Ischemia‒Reperfusion Injury: Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Targets.

Guoqing Liu, Yuying Dai, Chuwen Fu, Xiangwen Lv, Jiahui Qin, Jian Xie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. New Insights into Cardiac Intensive Care.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. N-International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guoqing Liu *Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Yuying Dai *Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0004-8665-5792
Chuwen FuDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Xiangwen LvDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Jiahui QinDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Jian XieDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0002-8590-9725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myocardial infarction is a significant contributor to both morbidity and mortality worldwide. An effective therapeutic strategy for myocardial infarction is myocardial reperfusion via percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolytic therapy. However, reperfusion may cause another inflammatory injury to surviving cardiomyocytes, inducing further cardiomyocyte death, increasing infarct size and even leading to heart failure. Current clinical interventions mostly target a single pathology and fail to effectively regulate the repair process in the later stages of injury, resulting in limited therapeutic efficacy. Recent studies have shown that macrophages play a dual role in ischemia‒reperfusion injury: dynamic changes in their phenotype directly determine the balance between the inflammatory response and tissue repair. In addition, macrophages play a key intersection role in multiple pathological mechanisms, including but not limited to, the regulation of oxidative stress, the drive of programmed cell death, and the remodeling of the microenvironment. This review summarizes the mechanisms of macrophage injury in myocardial ischemia‒reperfusion and potential strategies for macrophage-centric targeted therapy. Currently, most studies on potential therapeutic targets are still at the animal experimental stage. Owing to simplified disease models, macrophage therapy is still not well studied in terms of target mechanisms and microenvironmental metabolic reprogramming. In addition, the clinical feasibility of targeted therapies remains to be verified owing to their low delivery efficiency and off-target effects, and further clinical studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of these therapies. In the future, macrophage-related drug research is expected to lead to breakthroughs in the treatment of reperfusion injury.

Indexed as

MacrophagesMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryAnimalsHumansinflammatory responsemacrophage polarizationmyocardial ischemia‒reperfusion injurytreatment

Identifiers

PMID40766819
PMCPMC12323797

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.