ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2025
Macrophage Polarization in Myocardial Ischemia‒Reperfusion Injury: Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Targets.
Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- New Insights into Cardiac Intensive Care.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- FTO-mediated m6A demethylation of TRIM21 regulates macrophage polarization and attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.Immunologic research · 2026Article
- N-International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Mechanisms of mitochondrial dysfunction and protective strategies in skin flap ischemia-reperfusion injury.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Macrophage polarization in ischemia-reperfusion injury: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial infarction is a significant contributor to both morbidity and mortality worldwide. An effective therapeutic strategy for myocardial infarction is myocardial reperfusion via percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolytic therapy. However, reperfusion may cause another inflammatory injury to surviving cardiomyocytes, inducing further cardiomyocyte death, increasing infarct size and even leading to heart failure. Current clinical interventions mostly target a single pathology and fail to effectively regulate the repair process in the later stages of injury, resulting in limited therapeutic efficacy. Recent studies have shown that macrophages play a dual role in ischemia‒reperfusion injury: dynamic changes in their phenotype directly determine the balance between the inflammatory response and tissue repair. In addition, macrophages play a key intersection role in multiple pathological mechanisms, including but not limited to, the regulation of oxidative stress, the drive of programmed cell death, and the remodeling of the microenvironment. This review summarizes the mechanisms of macrophage injury in myocardial ischemia‒reperfusion and potential strategies for macrophage-centric targeted therapy. Currently, most studies on potential therapeutic targets are still at the animal experimental stage. Owing to simplified disease models, macrophage therapy is still not well studied in terms of target mechanisms and microenvironmental metabolic reprogramming. In addition, the clinical feasibility of targeted therapies remains to be verified owing to their low delivery efficiency and off-target effects, and further clinical studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of these therapies. In the future, macrophage-related drug research is expected to lead to breakthroughs in the treatment of reperfusion injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.