ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025
Enhanced recovery after surgery-guided strategies in single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty for inguinal hernia: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study on the application of modified intraoperative gas evacuation combined with perioperative pressure and cold compress in TAPP repair of inguinal hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Observational
- Gastric tube placement through the drainage channel of second-generation supraglottic airway devices: a systematic review with evidence mapping.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Preclinical models of stem cell-mediated analgesia and tissue repair: mechanisms, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Review
- Clinical efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in intervening patients with ureteral calculi complicated with infection and its impact on quality of life.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy and implementation challenges of single-port laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair (SIL-TEP) combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the treatment of inguinal hernia. Methods: This review summarized the technical advantages of SIL-TEP in reducing postoperative pain, accelerating functional recovery and improving cosmetic results compared with traditional three-port TEP. The perioperative strategies under eras concept were further discussed, including preoperative nutrition optimization, laryngeal mask airway (LMA) use, early oral feeding, multimodal analgesia and timely removal of urinary catheter. Results: SIL-TEP combined with ERAS had significant clinical benefits, including decreased pain score at 24 h after operation, shortened recovery time of daily activities, and improved patient satisfaction with incision appearance. ERAS interventions have resulted in reduced length of hospital stay; however, there are still technical limitations, including difficulties in device triangulation and learning curve requirements for the number of medical records. Conclusions: The collaborative application of SIL-TEP and ERAS represents a paradigm shift in minimally invasive hernia management, achieving enhanced recovery metrics and cost-effectiveness. Although the current evidence supports superiority in the short term, more multicenter randomized trials (RCTS) with 5-year follow-up are needed to verify long-term recurrence rates and socioeconomic impact. Standardized training programs and AI-assisted surgical systems may address existing technical barriers to widespread adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.