ReviewCurrent opinion in pulmonary medicine2025
Sex differences in pulmonary (arterial) hypertension: does it matter?
Review in Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Lung-Liver Axis in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Comprehensive Physiology · 2026Article
- Metabolomics of Right Ventricular Function in Pulmonary Hypertension.Circulation research · 2026Article
- Male Sex Is Associated With Severe Pulmonary Hypertension and Worse Outcome in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients Referred for Right Heart Catheterization.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
- Sex-specific insights in atherosclerosis and pulmonary arterial hypertension: an overlooked comorbidity.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review synthesizes the current prevailing theories behind the 'sex paradox' or 'sex puzzle' in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a disease marked by sexual dimorphism. To a lesser extent, we also review sex differences in other forms of pulmonary hypertension. RECENT
findingsAlthough more females than males develop PAH worldwide, female sex is associated with improved right ventricular (RV) function and survival. We review the role of sex chromosomes and sex hormones and their relationships to genomic and epigenetic regulation, immune function, and RV function, sex-based differences in therapeutic response and social determinants of health and intersectionality with gender in PAH pathobiology, prevalence and outcomes. We include experimental studies and observational human data that have led to the study of sex hormone modulation as a treatment strategy in PAH, with recently completed clinical trials. In addition, we explore potential future directions to help understand the mechanisms that underpin sex biases in pulmonary vascular disease, as well as those that may inform potential therapeutic targets. SUMMARY: Survival in PAH depends on RV function, and females have improved survival despite increased prevalence for reasons that remain unclear. While knowledge gaps remain, recent advancements offer promise and many future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.