Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40767440›Full record

Observational studyInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Progression Patterns in Foveal-Sparing Geographic Atrophy With Double-Layer Sign Due to Neovascularization or Basal Laminar Deposits.

Serena Fragiotta, Mariacristina Parravano, Riccardo Sacconi, Maria Sole Polito, Benedetta Cioffi, Federico Rissotto, Federico Beretta, Eliana Costanzo, Enrico Romano, Vittorio Capuano and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. The impact of macular neovascularization development on geographic atrophy progression.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Serena FragiottaOphthalmology Unit, "Sapienza" University of Rome, NESMOS Department, St. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Mariacristina ParravanoIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy.
Riccardo SacconiSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Maria Sole PolitoIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy.
Benedetta CioffiSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Federico RissottoSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Federico BerettaSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Eliana CostanzoIRCCS-Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy.
Enrico RomanoOphthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal De Creteil, Creteil, France.
Vittorio CapuanoOphthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal De Creteil, Creteil, France.
Eric H SouiedOphthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal De Creteil, Creteil, France.
Giuseppe QuerquesSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the prognostic significance of double-layer sign (DLS) in eyes with foveal-sparing geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study analyzed 46 eyes (46 patients) with foveal sparing GA and associated DLS, using fundus autofluorescence (FAF), near-infrared reflectance (NIR), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCT angiography (OCTA). DLS was defined based on OCTA findings as either thick basal laminar deposits (BLamD) or non-exudative macular neovascularization (NE-MNV). The area of GA and foveal sparing were estimated on both FAF and NIR at different time points. Centrifugal and centripetal GA growth rates referring to the lesion expansion away from and toward the fovea, respectively, were evaluated using a mathematical formula. Results: Of the 46 eyes enrolled, 25 had thick BLamD, whereas 21 had type 1 NE-MNV. The NE-MNV eyes showed significantly thicker DLS than those with BLamD (90.4 ± 39.8 µm vs. 57.0 ± 27 µm, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34 to 0.78, P < 0.001). GA areas were smaller on FAF than NIR (95% CI = -0.89 to -0.03, P = 0.03) in the BLamD group, whereas no difference was observed in the NE-MNV group (95% CI = -0.37 to 0.64, P = 0.60). Despite similar GA areas, the NE-MNV eyes exhibited larger foveal sparing (95% CI = 0.02 to 1.21, P = 0.04). The foveal sparing area remained stable (F(1.2, 11 = 4.15, P = 0.06, ω2 = 0.02) in the NE-MNV group, whereas a significant reduction was observed in the BLamD subgroup (F(1.39, 20.9) = 7.5, P < 0.001, ω2 = 0.09). Conclusions: OCTA has provided valuable insights into the pathogenic interpretation of the DLS signature. Our findings confirm that a neovascular DLS protects the retinal pigment epithelium and outer retina, contributing to prolonged foveal preservation.

Indexed as

Choroidal NeovascularizationFovea CentralisGeographic AtrophyRetinal NeovascularizationAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40767440
PMCPMC12347187

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.