Observational studyInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Progression Patterns in Foveal-Sparing Geographic Atrophy With Double-Layer Sign Due to Neovascularization or Basal Laminar Deposits.
Observational study in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonexudative Macular Neovascularization in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.JAMA ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- The impact of macular neovascularization development on geographic atrophy progression.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- TREM2 in age-related macular degeneration: a microglia-centered perspective in the retinal myeloid landscape.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the prognostic significance of double-layer sign (DLS) in eyes with foveal-sparing geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study analyzed 46 eyes (46 patients) with foveal sparing GA and associated DLS, using fundus autofluorescence (FAF), near-infrared reflectance (NIR), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCT angiography (OCTA). DLS was defined based on OCTA findings as either thick basal laminar deposits (BLamD) or non-exudative macular neovascularization (NE-MNV). The area of GA and foveal sparing were estimated on both FAF and NIR at different time points. Centrifugal and centripetal GA growth rates referring to the lesion expansion away from and toward the fovea, respectively, were evaluated using a mathematical formula. Results: Of the 46 eyes enrolled, 25 had thick BLamD, whereas 21 had type 1 NE-MNV. The NE-MNV eyes showed significantly thicker DLS than those with BLamD (90.4 ± 39.8 µm vs. 57.0 ± 27 µm, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34 to 0.78, P < 0.001). GA areas were smaller on FAF than NIR (95% CI = -0.89 to -0.03, P = 0.03) in the BLamD group, whereas no difference was observed in the NE-MNV group (95% CI = -0.37 to 0.64, P = 0.60). Despite similar GA areas, the NE-MNV eyes exhibited larger foveal sparing (95% CI = 0.02 to 1.21, P = 0.04). The foveal sparing area remained stable (F(1.2, 11 = 4.15, P = 0.06, ω2 = 0.02) in the NE-MNV group, whereas a significant reduction was observed in the BLamD subgroup (F(1.39, 20.9) = 7.5, P < 0.001, ω2 = 0.09). Conclusions: OCTA has provided valuable insights into the pathogenic interpretation of the DLS signature. Our findings confirm that a neovascular DLS protects the retinal pigment epithelium and outer retina, contributing to prolonged foveal preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.