Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40767510›Full record

ArticleMolecular reproduction and development2025

microRNAs for qPCR Normalization Under Morphofunctional Conditions in Bovine Sperm (Bos taurus).

Lucas Petitemberte de Souza, Leandro Silva Nunes, Luana Carla Salvi, Laís Dos Santos Gonçalves, Luana Ferreira Viana Dos Reis, Izani Bonel Acosta, Carine Dahl Corcini, Antonio Sergio Varela Junior, Fábio Gularte Barreto, Marcelo Brandi Vieira and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular reproduction and development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lucas Petitemberte de SouzaLaboratório de Genômica Estrutural, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brasil.
Leandro Silva NunesLaboratório de Genômica Estrutural, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brasil.
Luana Carla SalviLaboratório de Genômica Estrutural, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brasil.
Laís Dos Santos GonçalvesLaboratório de Genômica Estrutural, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brasil.
Luana Ferreira Viana Dos ReisLaboratório de Genômica Estrutural, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brasil.
Izani Bonel AcostaFaculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brasil.
Carine Dahl CorciniFaculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brasil.
Antonio Sergio Varela JuniorInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brasil.
Fábio Gularte BarretoPROGEN Inseminação Artificial Ltda, Dom Pedrito, Brasil.
Marcelo Brandi VieiraPROGEN Inseminação Artificial Ltda, Dom Pedrito, Brasil.
Diego Corrêa SilveiraPROGEN Inseminação Artificial Ltda, Dom Pedrito, Brasil.
Jeaniffer Melgarejo VieiraPROGEN Inseminação Artificial Ltda, Dom Pedrito, Brasil.
Gustavo Freitas IlhaSelect Sires do Brasil Genética Ltda, Porto Alegre, Brasil.
William Borges DominguesLaboratório de Genômica Estrutural, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brasil.
Vinicius Farias CamposLaboratório de Genômica Estrutural, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-2119-293X

Funding

This study was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (EDITAL FAPERGS/CNPq 07/2022 # 23/2551-0000181-0 and FAPERGS/SICT 06/2022 INOVA AGRO # 22/2551-0001645-6), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (Chamada CNPq/MCTI/CT-BIOTEC N° 31/2022 #440636/2022-1 and CNPq/MCTI N° 42/2024 # 407610/2024-3), Select Sires do Brasil LTDA (Partnership Agreement for Research, Development And Innovation # 23110.006754/2024-15), and was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) Finance Code 001 and CAPES PrInt - AUXPE #2537/2018. VFC, CDC and ASVJ are also individually supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cattle represents one of the most common and widely distributed categories of large ruminants, with well-established production practices. Fertility is a key factor that significantly influences the success of this production. Studies have shown that microRNAs (miRNAs) present in sperm cells play a crucial role as regulators of processes related to sperm functionality. miRNAs quantification by qPCR is one of the most accurate and straightforward methods, but this technique requires data normalization, and there is no universal consensus on which miRNAs should be used. The present study aimed to identify suitable miRNAs normalizers for qPCR analysis of Bos taurus semen. To achieve this, normalization candidates were assessed under different semen quality conditions, considering sperm morphology and motility. A small nuclear RNA (U6) and six miRNA candidates (Let-7c-5p, miR-100-5p, miR-25-3p, miR-26a-5p, miR-204-5p, miR-92a-3p) were selected. The expression stability of each candidate was analyzed using four independent methods (delta Ct, geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper), under the semen quality conditions. Additionally, a comprehensive stability analysis was conducted using RefFinder, for each condition individually and for the combined conditions. The results indicated that miR-92a-3p was the most stable reference miRNA for motility-related analyses, while Let-7c-5p emerged as the best candidate for morphology-focused analyses. As a normalizer to analyze samples concomitantly, Let-7c-5p was identified as the optimal normalizer, while miR-26a-5p was the least stable candidate. This study provides the first identification of miRNA normalizers for qPCR analysis of Bos taurus semen, enabling more accurate miRNA quantification in this biological matrix and species.

Indexed as

MicroRNAsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaAnimalsCattleMaleSperm MotilityMicroRNAsBos taurusnormalizing microRNAsqPCRsemenstability

Identifiers

PMID40767510
PMCPMC12327186

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.