ArticleCoDAS2025
Acoustic-prosodic measures discriminate the emotions of Brazilian portuguese speakers.
Article in CoDAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo verify if there is a difference in acoustic-prosodic measures in different emotional states of speakers of Brazilian Portuguese (BP).
methodsThe data sample consisted of 182 audio signals produced by actors (professionals or students), from the semi-spontaneous speech task "Look at the blue plane" in the various emotions (joy, sadness, fear, anger, surprise, disgust) and neutral emission. Values were extracted from acoustic-prosodic measures of duration, fundamental frequency and intensity of the various emotions. The Friedman comparison test was used to verify whether these measures are able to discriminate emotions.
resultsThe prosodic-acoustic analysis revealed significant variations between emotions. The disgust emotion stood out for having the highest rate of utterance, with higher values of duration. In contrast, the joy exhibited a more accelerated speech, with lower values of duration and greater intensity. Sadness and fear were marked by lower intensity and lower frequencies, and fear presented the lowest positive asymmetry values of z-score and z-smoothed, with less elongation of the segments. Anger was highlighted by the higher vocal intensity, while surprise recorded the highest values of fundamental frequency.
conclusionThe acoustic-prosodic measures proved to be effective tools for differentiating emotions in CP speakers. These parameters have great potential to discern different emotional states, broaden knowledge about vocal expressiveness and open possibilities for emotion recognition technologies with applications in artificial intelligence and mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.