ReviewEpidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil2025
Integrative and Complementary Health Practices for Chronic Pain: summary of clinical guideline recommendations.
Review in Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Evidence-informed policies: tools for decision-making in the Brazilian Unified Health System.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2026Article
- Myofascial pain in older adults: a geroscience-informed framework integrating precision geriatrics and digital therapeutics.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the recommendations of clinical guidelines that used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system (GRADE) for Integrative and Complementary Health Practices in the management of chronic pain in adults.
methodsA summary of evidence based on rapid review, in an agile, rigorous, and timely manner, to inform health decision-making. Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase and Scopus, and included clinical guidelines that assessed the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. The methodological quality of the guidelines included was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II tool, aiming to characterize how well-founded and transparent the included guidelines were.
resultsEighteen guidelines published between 2011 and 2024 were included, eight of which were of high methodological quality. The most recommended practices were acupuncture, osteopathy, chiropractic, yoga, tai chi, meditation, and relaxation techniques, for conditions such as low back pain, chronic pelvic pain, fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic pancreatitis and rheumatoid arthritis. The quality of the evidence supporting these recommendations was predominantly low to moderate, with recommendations overwhelmingly weak. The interventions were considered effective and had a favorable safety profile compared to conventional treatments. Strong recommendations included acupuncture, osteopathy, chiropractic, and yoga for low back pain.
conclusionThe quality of the evidence was limited, suggesting the need for further robust studies of interventions for chronic pain management. Acupuncture, osteopathy, chiropractic and yoga presented better evidence, with potential for effectiveness and safety for the Brazilian Unified Health System.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.