ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Serum total protein-to-albumin ratio and adverse clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a comparative study of US and Chinese cohorts.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the predictive value of serum total protein-to-albumin ratio (TAR) for all-cause mortality and other adverse clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD).
methodsData were obtained from two cohorts: 1628 patients with DM and CKD in cohort 1 from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and 341 renal biopsy-confirmed diabetic nephropathy (DN) patients in cohort 2 from West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Patients were grouped by the TAR levels. TAR was calculated as serum total protein divided by albumin. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards regression assessed associations between TAR and adverse clinical outcomes, adjusting for demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables. Stratification, interaction, and correlation analyses were performed.
resultIn cohort 1, higher TAR independently increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk (HR 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-2.17, HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.09-3.58, respectively). Subgroup analyses showed significant association between TAR and all-cause mortality in participants with albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) < 30 mg/g (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.15-4.75), with an interaction observed for ACR (P for interaction = 0.048). Patients in the high TAR group with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73m
conclusionHigher TAR was associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in DM and CKD patients. Clinicians can use TAR to better stratify risk and guide treatment, improving outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40767948What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.