Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40767986›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2026

Educator perspectives on costs and cost-conscious decision-making in health professions education: a Q-Method study.

Jennifer Yaros, Mirjam Oude Egbrink, Benedikt Langenberg, Silvia Evers, Aggie Paulus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer YarosDepartment of Health Services Research (HSR), Maastricht University, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Maastricht, The Netherlands. j.yaros@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-4976-5202
Mirjam Oude EgbrinkDepartment of Physiology, Maastricht University, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5530-6598
Benedikt LangenbergDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4757-0698
Silvia EversDepartment of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1026-570X
Aggie PaulusDepartment of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, School of Health Professions Education (SHE), and Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2086-6106

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensification of resource scarcity in health professions education (HPE) requires careful consideration of educational costs. Educators play a significant role in this process, as they make resource allocation decisions when designing, developing, organizing and overseeing education, yet little is known about how educators view the idea of incorporating information on educational costs into decision-making. Therefore, this study maps educator views on cost-conscious decision-making in HPE. Using Q-Methodology, we explored how HPE educators perceive costs and cost-conscious decision-making. Participants ranked 34 statements and engaged in semi-structured interviews. By-person inverted factor analysis with varimax rotation was used to extract factors representing distinct patterns of thinking held by three or more educators. These patterns were interpreted using factor arrays, distinguishing and consensus statements, and interview transcripts, yielding narrative descriptions of unique educator perspectives. Twenty-five educators holding diverse educational responsibilities and 1-29 years of experience were classified into four distinct perspectives. Unaware Doubters (n = 3) are unexposed to educational cost considerations and lack motivation for involvement. Cautious Realists (n = 8) are personally impacted by resource constraints, yet hesitant about cost-conscious decision-making. Pragmatic Supporters (n = 8) hold implicit awareness of resource scarcity but remain open to participation in cost-conscious decision-making. Empowered Agents (n = 6) are aware, active and engaged in cost-conscious decision-making, yet seek a unifying vision and transparent communication from leadership. These four distinct educator perspectives on costs and cost-conscious decision-making in education illustrate varying levels of awareness, motivation and engagement, which indicates the need for tailored strategies to improve cost-conscious decision-making in HPE. This information can be used by educational institutes to develop a vision, policy and strategy to involve educators in considerations concerning educational costs in view of the increasing resource scarcity in HPE. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of different strategies targeted to these perspectives and explore how perspectives vary across settings and contexts.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth OccupationsAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchCost-conscious decision-makingCostsHealth professions educationQ-Method

Identifiers

PMID40767986
PMCPMC13046565

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.