ReviewAging and disease2025
Insights into Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease: From Core Markers to Emerging Directions.
Review in Aging and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Advancements in Nanomaterial-Based Biosensors for Neuropsychiatric and Neurodegenerative Diagnostics: From Biomarker Discovery to Clinical Translation.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Analytical Methods for Fluid Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease from Discovery to Clinical Implementation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Combined plasma and imaging biomarkers as predictors of neurological outcome in cervical traumatic spinal cord injury.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Detection of Synaptic Vesicle Glycoprotein 2A in Serum Using a Polypyrrole-Functionalized Graphene Oxide Electrochemical Immunosensor.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) represents a neurodegenerative condition characterized by steadily increasing prevalence and incidence, arising significant challenge to both patients and social insurance. However, the etiology of AD remains controversial so far, and pathogenesis is far more complicated. Presently, no definitive therapeutic methodologies were available for AD, and only partial symptomatic relief can be achieved. Consequently, early diagnosis and intervention are emergently needed for AD patients. The diagnostic criteria for AD are continuously evolving, and biomarker testing is becoming increasingly critical for diagnosis. Currently, the diagnosis of AD primarily relies on the detection of pathological proteins through cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing and positron emission tomography (PET). However, factors such as high costs, operational contraindications, and invasiveness limited the application of these technologies, making them particularly challenging to implement in large-scale clinical trials and screenings. Core fluid biomarkers for AD including β-amyloid (Aβ), phosphorylated tau protein (p-tau), total tau protein (t-tau), and their combinations were found in CSF. Although these biomarkers were demonstrated with significant specificity and sensitivity, challenges remain high concerning the collection of CSF. Blood-derived biomarkers for Aβ and tau proteins are essential for preliminary screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of AD. Additionally, other bodily fluids such as saliva, urine, and tears have been investigated for their potential as biomarkers, offering unique characteristics and applications. Emerging biomarkers, including neurofilament light chain (NfL), neurogranin (Ng), Beta-site APP cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1), synaptosome associated protein 25 (SNAP-25), as well as inflammation-related and gene-related factors, provided valuable insights into the diagnosis and pathogenesis of AD from diverse perspectives. Despite the substantial progress made in AD biomarker research, there are still baskets of limitations concerning the complication of the disease. The current review focused on the reported literature to summarize the biomarkers associated with AD. By critically analyzing studies published over the past decade, we aimed to strengthen the recent research progress, theoretical frameworks, and unresolved challenges related to AD biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.