ArticleScientific reports2025
Glial fibrillary acidic protein in plasma and intraocular fluids and the correlation with cognitive function in patients with vitreoretinal disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ocular imaging and fluid protein levels are emerging as biomarkers for neurodegenerative disease. Elevated levels of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a marker of astrogliosis, have been demonstrated early in the course of Alzheimer's Disease. In this study, we measured GFAP levels in the aqueous and vitreous humors and plasma of 79 participants undergoing vitrectomy surgery for retinal disease and correlated them with subject Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE) and Trail Making Test part b (TMT-b) scores. Measured GFAP concentrations were higher in vitreous and aqueous than in plasma. Levels of GFAP within the aqueous and vitreous were correlated (r = 0.6; p < 0.0001); however, there was no association between GFAP levels in either ocular fluid and plasma. There was no significant correlation between GFAP levels in any of the measured ocular fluids and cognition as measured by MMSE and TMT-b scores. In plasma, higher GFAP levels were associated with lower TMT-b, but not MMSE, scores. Given that elevated GFAP levels are associated with a variety of vitreoretinal diseases, future studies evaluating its use as a potential biomarker for dementias should concentrate on recruiting subjects without a history of ocular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.