ArticleCommunications biology2025
Chronological age estimation from human microbiomes with transformer-based Robust Principal Component Analysis.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Forensic Microbiomics and Trace Microbial Evidence: Molecular Innovations for Linking Suspects, Objects, and Environments.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Microbiome and aging: Trajectories of microbiome age across human ecosystems and their systemic effects.iMeta · 2026Review
- Paradigm Shift of Microbiota-gut-brain Axis During Aging: Potential Role of Probiotics to Improve Cognitive Decline.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Advances in skin aging: integrating epigenetic, cellular, and immune mechanisms for targeted therapy.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2026Review
- Mapping the canine gut microbiome: insights from the Dog Aging Project.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Clinical translation of salivary MicroAge for understanding the oral-systemic connection in healthy longevity.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic impact of Mongolian Andai therapy on gut microbiota and metabolomic profiles in depression.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota dynamics in SAMP8 mice: insights from machine learning and longitudinal analysis.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning for microbiome analysis has shown potential for understanding microbial communities and human phenotypes. Here, we propose an approach, Transformer-based Robust Principal Component Analysis(TRPCA), which leverages the strengths of transformer architectures and interpretability of Robust Principal Component Analysis. To investigate benefits of TRPCA over conventional machine learning models, we benchmarked performance on age prediction from three body sites(skin, oral, gut), with 16S rRNA gene amplicon(16S) and whole-genome sequencing(WGS) data. We demonstrated prediction of age from longitudinal samples and combined classification and regression tasks via multi-task learning(MTL). TRPCA improves age prediction accuracy from human microbiome samples, achieving the largest reduction in Mean Absolute Error for WGS skin (MAE: 8.03, 28% reduction) and 16S skin (MAE: 5.09, 14% reduction) samples, compared to conventional approaches. Additionally, TRPCA's MTL approach achieves an accuracy of 89% for birth country prediction across 5 countries, while improving age prediction from WGS stool samples. Notably, TRPCA uncovers a link between subject and error prediction through residual analysis for paired samples across sequencing method (16S/WGS) and body site(oral/gut). These findings highlight TRPCA's utility in improving age prediction while maintaining feature-level interpretability, and elucidating connections between individuals and microbiomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.