ArticleScientific reports2025
Alzheimer's disease risk prediction using machine learning for survival analysis with a comorbidity-based approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feature Selection Analysis and Robustness to Missing Data for Sensor-Based Prognostic Modeling of Alzheimer's Disease Progression.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Longitudinal multi-modal data prediction model for mild cognitive impairment by deep survival analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- PredatorNet: a clinically trustworthy deep learning framework for multi-class Alzheimer's disease classification using MRI.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Gender-based Alzheimer's detection using ResNet-50 and binary dragonfly algorithm on neuroimaging.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Mental and behavioral disorder mortality in Poland, 2000-2023: a national age-standardized Joinpoint regression study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) presents a pressing global health challenge, demanding improved strategies for early detection and understanding its progression. In this study, we address this need by employing survival analysis techniques to predict transition time from Cognitive Normal (CN) to Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in elderly individuals, considering the predictive value of baseline comorbidities. Leveraging data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and Australian Imaging, Biomarker & Lifestyle Flagship Study of Ageing (AIBL) databases, we construct feature sets encompassing demographics, cognitive scores, and comorbidities. Various machine learning and deep learning methods for survival analysis are employed. Our top-performing model, fast random forest, achieves a concordance index of 0.84 when considering all feature modalities, with comorbidity data emerging as a significant predictor. The top features identified by the best-performing model include one demographic feature (age), seven cognitive scores (ADAS13, RAVLT learning, FAQ, ADAS11, RAVLT immediate, CDRSB, ADASQ4), and two comorbidities (Endocrine & Metabolic, Renal & Genitourinary). Age is highlighted as the most influential predictor, while cognitive scores are crucial indicators of Alzheimer's disease. External validation against the AIBL dataset affirms the robustness of our approach. Overall, our study contributes to a deeper understanding of the role of baseline comorbidities in AD risk prediction and emphasizes the importance of incorporating comprehensive feature assessment in clinical practice for early diagnosis and personalized treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.