ArticleScientific data2025
Machine learning training data: over 500,000 images of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) with species labels.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Manage your image database with computer vision-Lessons learned at Encyclopedia of Life.Bioscience · 2026Article
- Machine learning training data: over 500,000 images of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) with species labels.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning models can accelerate the processing of image-based biodiversity data and provide educational value by giving direct feedback to citizen scientists. However, the training of such models requires large amounts of labelled data and not all species are equally suited for identification from images alone. Most butterfly and many moth species (Lepidoptera) which play an important role as biodiversity indicators are well-suited for such approaches. This dataset contains over 540.000 images of 185 butterfly and moth species that occur in Austria. Images were collected by citizen scientists with the application "Schmetterlinge Österreichs" and correct species identification was ensured by an experienced entomologist. The number of images per species ranges from one to nearly 30.000. Such a strong class imbalance is common in datasets of species records. The dataset is larger than other published dataset of butterfly and moth images and offers opportunities for the training and evaluation of machine learning models on the fine-grained classification task of species identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.