Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40770360›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025

Comparative analysis of continuous pericapsular nerve group block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block for postoperative analgesia in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Onur Baran, Ayhan Şahin, Cavidan Arar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06806865 (Comparison of Continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block With Continuous PENG Block in Total Hip Replacement Cases), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06806865 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block With Continuous PENG Block in Total Hip Replacement Cases

TypeinterventionalSponsorNamik Kemal UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsPostoperative Pain, Regional Anesthesia, Pain Management, Total Hip ArthroplastyArmsPeriarticular nerve group block (PENG), Continuous supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (SIFICB)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Onur BaranDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Medical Faculty of Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Kampüs Cd. No: 1, Süleymanpaşa, Tekirdağ, 59100, Türkiye. dronurbaran@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0007-6315
Ayhan ŞahinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Medical Faculty of Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Kampüs Cd. No: 1, Süleymanpaşa, Tekirdağ, 59100, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3539-2353
Cavidan ArarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Medical Faculty of Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Kampüs Cd. No: 1, Süleymanpaşa, Tekirdağ, 59100, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1952-427X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective postoperative pain management is essential for recovery after total hip arthroplasty. While opioids are commonly used, their adverse effects necessitate alternative strategies. Peripheral nerve blocks are increasingly utilized, including the pericapsular nerve group block and the supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block. However, comparative data on their efficacy remain limited. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the analgesic effectiveness of these two techniques. The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores at rest and with movement. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, the need for rescue analgesia, and hemodynamic stability.

methodsSixty patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either a pericapsular nerve group block or a supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block. Standardized ultrasound-guided techniques were used with equal volumes of local anesthetic. Pain scores were assessed postoperatively using the Visual Analog Scale. Opioid consumption and rescue analgesia use were recorded for twenty-four hours.

resultsAt 12 and 24 h postoperatively, median VAS scores at rest and during movement were significantly lower in the PENG group (≤ 2.0) compared to the SIFICB group (> 4.0) (P < 0.001). Opioid consumption in the first 24 h was significantly lower in the PENG group (11.1 ± 1.5 mg morphine equivalents) than in the SIFICB group (18.4 ± 2.5 mg; P < 0.001). Hemodynamic parameters were stable, with no significant complications.

conclusionsThe pericapsular nerve group block provided superior analgesia and reduced opioid consumption compared to the supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block. It should be considered a practical component of multimodal pain management for total hip arthroplasty. IRB NUMBER: Ethics Committee of Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University (2023.06.01.06). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06806865).

Indexed as

AnalgesiaArthroplasty, Replacement, HipNerve BlockPain ManagementPostoperative PainAgedAnalgesics, OpioidFasciaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidAcute painPain managementPostoperative painRegional anesthesiaTotal hip arthroplastyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40770360
PMCPMC12326786

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.