ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
Factors affecting compliance in CPAP device usage for obstructive sleep apnea: a mixed-methods study integrating quantitative and qualitative findings.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Global Initiative for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (GIFOSA): Rationale, Strategic Framework, and Call to Action.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Review
- The impact of short-term ambient air pollution on CPAP therapy outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Article
- Adherence Patterns to Positive Airway Pressure in Elderly Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Open respiratory archivesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to identify novel factors influencing adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) devices, the primary treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and to compile the most comprehensive list of variables in the literature.
methodsA mixed-methods approach was adopted, analyzing patient records from a sleep center between 2018 and July 1, 2023. Quantitative data were obtained from surveys administered to 449 patients, while qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews with 30 patients and document reviews of 449 records. Analyses were conducted using FACTORY Analysis, SmartPLS, IBM SPSS, and MAXQDA software.
resultsThe combined analysis of quantitative and qualitative findings identified previously unreported variables affecting CPAP adherence. A comprehensive list of influencing factors was developed, spanning device/accessory-related, psychosocial, environmental, individual, regional, and political domains. Eight novel variables were uncovered, including barriers such as fear of lightning/thunder, fear of earthquakes, relocation, religious practices, air pollution, and long hair, as well as facilitators like the use of automatic devices and rural residency. These findings indicate that existing theories and models are insufficient to fully explain CPAP adherence, highlighting the complexity of the process.
conclusionThis study highlights the complexity of CPAP adherence and calls for new theoretical models. It highlights the importance of geographical, cultural, and religious influences, advocating for further research to address these gaps and improve patient adherence strategies. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40770582What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.