ArticleMicrobial cell factories2025
Primary high-throughput screening of engineered phytases by online monitoring of the oxygen transfer rate of Komagataella phaffii.
Article in Microbial cell factories, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early bioprocess development using Komagataella phaffii: application scenarios for the microTOM mini bioreactor system.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Article
- Online Monitoring of Oxygen Transfer Rate as a Versatile Tool for Fermentation Characterization and Optimization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecombinant phytase production has recently gained increased recognition in phosphate recycling from phytate contained in plant-based side and waste streams. Until now, new phytase variants are evaluated at the end of the expression by standard offline screening procedures, where promising candidates with high activities and protein titers are identified. However, for large mutant libraries, this implies extensive laboratory work for a first screening of hundreds of clones. In this study, for the first time, two synergistic concepts for the primary screening of phytases were investigated.
resultsThe aim was to predict high recombinant protein producer strains as well as high volumetric activity phytase variants, based on the development of the respiratory activity over time of the host cell, in this case, Komagataella phaffii (Pichia pastoris). In a first step, the metabolic burden was investigated by cultivating a clone library in YPD medium in a µTOM device. It was found that strains expressing medium or high protein concentrations show clear characteristics of an elevated level of metabolic burden during constitutive expression. However, a high protein concentration does not imply a high enzymatic activity. Therefore, in a second approach, the screening was adapted to screen for phytase variants with high volumetric activity. To do so, a modified Syn6 MES medium was developed, where phytic acid was used as the only phosphate source. Thereby, only clones secreting active phytase and generating free phosphate were able to grow, which was monitored via the oxygen transfer rate. A correlation between the offline measured volumetric phytase activity and µ
conclusionOnline monitoring of the oxygen transfer rates in 96-well plates allowed for the evaluation of the total protein concentration and the volumetric phytase activity already during the expression. Using these results, also the specific activity can be calculated. In the future, primary screening experiments of large enzyme mutant libraries can be conducted without offline activity assays, to identify promising candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.