Evidence mapPaperPMID 40770775Full record

Trial reportStem cell research & therapy2025

Phase II trial of intravenous human dental pulp stem cell therapy for Huntington's disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Joyce Macedo Sanches Fernandes, Eduardo Pagani, Cristiane Valverde Wenceslau, Leandro Hideki Ynoue, Luciana Ferrara, Irina Kerkis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03252535 (Dose-Response Evaluation of the Investigational Product Cellavita HD After Intravenous Administration in Patients With Huntington's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03252535 phase2completednot on this map

Dose-Response Evaluation of the Investigational Product Cellavita HD After Intravenous Administration in Patients With Huntington's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzidus BrasilRan2018 to 2021Enrolled49ConditionsHuntington DiseaseArmsCellavita HD lower dose, Cellavita HD higher dose, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joyce Macedo Sanches FernandesFaculdade de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, 13083-872, Brazil. joycemacedosilva@gmail.com.
Eduardo PaganiAzidus Brasil, Valinhos, SP, 13271-130, Brazil. eduardo.pagani@azdcro.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6366-0829
Cristiane Valverde WenceslauCellavita Pesquisas Científicas Ltda., Valinhos, SP, 13278-078, Brazil.
Leandro Hideki YnoueAzidus Brasil, Valinhos, SP, 13271-130, Brazil.
Luciana FerraraAzidus Brasil, Valinhos, SP, 13271-130, Brazil.
Irina KerkisLaboratório de Genética, Centro de Desenvolvimento e Inovação (CDI), Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, SP, 05503-900, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuntington's disease (HD) is a rare, autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder caused by an expansion of cytosine-adenine-guanine (CAG) trinucleotide repeats in the huntingtin (HTT) gene. It manifests with motor, cognitive, and behavioural impairments, leading to progressive functional decline over approximately 20 years. Despite symptomatic treatments, no approved disease-modifying therapies are currently available, though experimental approaches are under investigation. Recent research has explored human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) as a potential therapeutic approach due to their neurotrophic properties and ability to modulate neuroinflammation. This Phase II trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of NestaCell®, an allogeneic hDPSC-based therapy, in patients with HD.

methodsThis randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included 35 patients assigned at a 2:2:1 ratio to receive hDPSCs at 1 million cells/kg, 2 million cells/kg, or placebo over nine intravenous infusions across 11 months. The primary endpoint was the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Total Motor Score (TMS) change. Secondary outcomes included UHDRS Total Functional Capacity (TFC), Total Chorea Score (TCS), Functional Checklist (FC), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based white matter quantification. Safety was assessed by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and laboratory parameters.

resultsBoth doses demonstrated a favourable safety profile, with no increased incidence of adverse events compared to the placebo. No serious adverse event was deemed related to treatment. Both doses significantly improved UHDRS-TMS compared to placebo (p = 0.005), while the 2 million cells/kg group showed significant benefits in UHDRS-TFC (p = 0.011). Additional improvements were observed in the TCS and FC, suggesting a broader clinical impact. MRI analysis indicated a non-significant trend toward neuroprotection, with slower central nervous system (CNS) white and grey matter decline in treated patients.

conclusionsNestaCell® was well tolerated and showed statistically significant improvements in motor and functional outcomes in HD patients. While MRI trends suggest a potential neuroprotective effect, further investigation is warranted. These findings support the advancement to a Phase III trial to confirm efficacy and long-term safety in a larger cohort.

trial registrationThis study was registered on August 16, 2017, at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03252535; https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?cond=NCT03252535 ).

Indexed as

Dental PulpHuntington DiseaseStem CellsStem Cell TransplantationAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedHuntington’s diseaseStem cellsUnified Huntington’s disease rating scale

Identifiers

PMID40770775
PMCPMC12330078

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.