ArticleScience progress
Enhancing body fat prediction with WGAN-GP data augmentation and XGBoost algorithm.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision obesity medicine: a translational perspective on epigenetics, the gut microbiome, and AI-assisted multi-omics integration.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Addressing multicollinearity in general linear model: A novel approach for ridge parameter with performance comparison.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and ObjectiveMachine learning models offer a practical approach for estimating body fat percentage from simple anthropometric data. However, the scarcity of biomedical data frequently leads to model overfitting, compromising predictive accuracy. Generative data augmentation presents a promising strategy to address this limitation. This study develops and evaluates a generative data augmentation framework to enhance body fat prediction from limited anthropometric data.MethodsA public dataset comprising 249 male subjects was partitioned into development (80%) and test (20%) sets. The fidelity of Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP), random noise injection, and mixup was compared to select the optimal method. Subsequently, XGBoost, Support Vector Regression, and Multi-layer Perceptron models were trained and validated, comparing performance with and without the selected augmentation. Final model generalization was assessed on the independent test set using the coefficient of determination (R²), Mean Absolute Error, and Root Mean Squared Error.ResultsAmong the evaluated augmentation techniques, the WGAN-GP generated synthetic data with the highest fidelity. On the original data, the baseline XGBoost model achieved a R² of 0.67; this performance increased to 0.77 on the test set when using WGAN-GP augmentation. Feature importance analysis of the final model identified abdominal circumference as the most significant predictor of body fat percentage.ConclusionThe WGAN-GP is a highly effective method for generating realistic synthetic anthropometric data. Integrating these synthetic samples into the training pipeline substantially improves the generalization and predictive accuracy of machine learning models. This methodology offers a robust solution for developing more accurate and accessible predictive health models in data-scarce environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.