ArticleBMJ nutrition, prevention & health2025
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect on human strength and endurance after resistance training and supplementation of Vicia faba protein hydrolysate compared with placebo.
Article in BMJ nutrition, prevention & health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05946746 (A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of PeptiStrong Supplementation in Conjunction with an Exercise Program to Enhance Muscle Strength in Young Subjects), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of PeptiStrong Supplementation in Conjunction with an Exercise Program to Enhance Muscle Strength in Young Subjects
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effects of a Design: A double-blind placebo-controlled parallel trial. Participants: 72 healthy men and women aged 19-40, stratified in a 1:1 ratio by gender. Participants were excluded if they performed >3 hours of resistance training per week in the 6 months prior. Setting: Ontario, Canada. Study performed by KGK Science from August 2023 to January 2024. Intervention: VFH or silica microcrystalline cellulose is given in five capsules daily for 56 days. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome: Leg strength Results: Intergroup analysis revealed a significantly greater increase in leg strength compared with placebo at day 28 (p=0.045) and 56 (p=0.05), respectively. Significantly enhanced muscular endurance was also observed from days 0 to 56 with a difference of 2.2 times in the change in repetitions performed from baseline (p=0.022) and a 21.6% increase compared with the placebo. Significant changes in bone mineral content were reported between groups (p=0.032) with a mean increase of 0.7% gained in the VFH group. The improvements in performance were supported by myokine analysis where VFH was shown to modulate a range of biomarkers associated with glucose homeostasis, bone formation, mitochondrial and metabolic function. Quantitative physical strength gains were consistent with qualitative data which showed significantly improved changes in self-assessed health. Conclusions: VFH supplementation demonstrated significant improvements in muscular strength, endurance and bone mineral content when compared with placebo. These low-dose, peptide-induced improvements enhance the effects of exercise for musculoskeletal health and have the potential to influence all-cause mortality Trial registration number: NCT05946746.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.