ReviewACS sensors2025
Toward a Disruptive "Click-and-Run" 3D Printing Concept for Manufacturing Epidermal Wearable Electrochemical Sensors.
Review in ACS sensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fully 3D-Printed Analytical Device Based on a Novel Floating Electrode Mechanism for Sweat Rate Acquisition.ACS measurement science au · 2026Article
- Monolithic Potentiometric Cell Using Fused Filament Fabrication.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidermal wearable sensing is a revolutionary concept with the potential of accomplishing a genuine digital transformation in research fields, such as sports physiology, clinical diagnostics, and health monitoring. The first wearable sweat sensor was reported 15 years ago, and despite the remarkable progress along this period, substantial challenges remain open concerning the complex nature of the manufacturing process. The recent democratization and extensive application of 3D printing technologies have made the automated fabrication of electrochemical sensors feasible, including their integration into complex structures such as microfluidic devices. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, there is no evidence of full 3D printing automation (i.e., all fabrication steps) of an entirely functional epidermal wearable. In this context, we aim to contribute to the community by introducing the concept of "click-and-run" 3D printing, which refers to the complete printing of an epidermal wearable sensor (but not limited to) by just a "click" followed by a "run". The run refers to the fact that after the click, you "run" away so that no other operations need to be performed, but it also indicates that you can go directly to "run" the experiments after the click. Evidently, this new concept cannot be materialized with traditional 3D printers. Therefore, we share herein how we envision a new generation of 3D printers specifically designed for overcoming the actual issues related to the manufacturing process of wearable sensors. Accordingly, this perspective article is organized as follows: (i) an overview of the advantages of ubiquitous desktop 3D printers and their potential to facilitate click-and-run printing, (ii) a tutorial revision of the main desktop 3D printing techniques and their relationship to manufacture electrochemical sensors, (iii) the rationalization of the required parts for a wearable sensor, (iv) a review of the recent advances and achievements in 3D-printed wearable sensors, and (v) our own description of the new generation of "click-and-run" 3D printers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.