ArticleCancer2025
Diabetes mellitus and neurocognition: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.
Article in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this research was to examine associations between diabetes mellitus (DM) and neurocognitive impairment in survivors of childhood cancer while exploring mechanistic associations with treatment exposures and moderating associations with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and risky lifestyle factors.
methodsSurvivors of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (N = 16,196; mean ± standard deviation age, 32.9 ± 7.9 years; 50.2% female; N = 615 with DM) self-reported neurocognitive functioning, risky drinking, physical inactivity, and tobacco use. Medical data were collected from chart review. Multivariable regression determined the association of DM with neurocognitive impairment while adjusting for relevant treatment exposures. Interactions between DM and treatment, risky lifestyle, and cardiovascular predictors on impairment were explored. Path analysis was used to examine the effects of treatment exposures through DM and CVD on impairment. Among survivors with DM, multivariable regressions examined predictors of neurocognitive change over time (mean, 11.21 years).
resultsSurvivors with DM had an increased risk of impairment relative to survivors without DM (task completion: odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% confidence limits [CI], 1.2-1.9; emotion regulation: OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0; and organization: OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0). The effects of cranial radiation on neurocognition were mediated by DM, including task completion (β = 0.02), emotion regulation (β = 0.02), memory (β = 0.01), and organization (β = 0.02; all p < .01). Among survivors with DM, CVD was associated with declines in task completion (estimate = 0.44; p < .01) and organization (estimate = 0.27; p = .03).
conclusionsSurvivors with DM are at increased risk of neurocognitive impairment. Although CVD did not exacerbate concurrent risk for impairment, it was associated with a decline in neurocognitive functioning over time in survivors with DM. Preventing/managing CVD in survivors with DM could mitigate additional neurocognitive decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.