ArticleRheumatology international2025
Practice patterns and challenges in the referral, diagnosis, management, and monitoring of axial spondyloarthritis: insights from an online survey of rheumatologists.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging pathways in spondyloarthritis: integrating radiography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, low-dose computed tomography, and artificial intelligence methods : Radiology and AI in SpA.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
- Practice patterns and challenges in the referral, diagnosis, management, and monitoring of axial spondyloarthritis: insights from an online survey of rheumatologists.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a dearth of literature exploring challenges faced by rheumatologists in the referral, diagnosis, and management of patients with suspected axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) worldwide. Our study aims to understand such challenges faced by rheumatologists in the Gulf countries. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among practicing rheumatologists using 35 close-ended questions. Items underwent refinement using a sensibility assessment, pilot-tested and followed international survey reporting guidelines. A total of 190 responses were received and analyzed. Most respondents were consultants (68.1%), practiced in tertiary governmental hospitals (52.7%) and located in urban settings (95.1%). A majority (88.6%) reported delayed presentation of axSpA patients. Orthopedists, family physicians, and internists were among the top referring specialties. Half of respondents believed that non-rheumatology specialists are reluctant to refer their axSpA patients to a rheumatologist. Diagnostic challenges were reported by 65.5% of respondents and only 28.8% experienced difficulty ordering or interpreting HLA-B27. The majority (76.6%) had access to a musculoskeletal radiologist to read X-rays and MRIs. Difficulties in tracking patient-reported outcomes and physical examination findings were reported by 46.9% and 31.5% of respondents, respectively. Patient non-adherence due to fear of drug side effects (61.4%) or symptom improvement (60.0%) was a leading obstacle in terms of management. Only 12% had access to a rheumatology-trained nurse. This is the first study from the Middle East and North Africa region to explore clinical practices and challenges related to axSpA. The findings highlight the need for educational initiatives targeting non-rheumatologists to promote earlier referrals, greater use of disease metrics for monitoring, and the development of Gulf-specific management recommendations that emphasize multidisciplinary support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40772964What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.