ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025
AdaptiveGS: an explainable genomic selection framework based on adaptive stacking ensemble machine learning.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benchmarking Feature Selection Methods and Prediction Models for Flowering Time Prediction in Maize.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key messageWe developed an adaptive and unified stacking genomic selection framework and designed a model interpretation strategy to identify the candidate significant SNPs of target traits. Genomic selection (GS) is an important technique in modern molecular breeding. As a powerful machine learning (ML) GS approach, stacking ensemble learning (SEL) combines multiple basic models (base learners, BLs) and effectively blends the strengths of different models to precisely depict the complex relationships between phenotypes and genotypes. However, in the key step of the SEL, there is currently a lack of an effective and unified framework for the selection of BLs. We developed adaptiveGS, an adaptive and explainable data-driven BLs selection strategy for the first time, to pre-screen the optimal BLs for stacking GS framework and improve the prediction accuracy. The adaptiveGS is performed based on the PR index, leveraging the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and the top 3 out of 7 (or self-setting) ML are tailored to be BLs via the PR index. We compared the adaptiveGS with 13 other GS algorithms based on a total of 21 traits (datasets) from 4 species. The results showed that adaptiveGS outperformed the 13 models on most of the 21 traits, with the average prediction accuracy (PCC) reaching 0.703, an average improvement of 14.4%, demonstrating superior predictive accuracy and robustness. Furthermore, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) technique was utilized to interpret the adaptiveGS and identify significant SNPs for trait variations and potential interaction effects between SNPs. The adaptiveGS provides an operable and unified solution for stacking GS users to improve prediction accuracy in the breeding field. The adaptiveGS package is accessible at https://github.com/yangzhen0117/adaptiveGS .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40772967What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.