ArticlePloS one2025
Behavioural rhythms of two amphipod species Marinogammarus marinus and Gammarus pulex under increasing levels of light at night.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial light at night (ALAN) is proliferating at an alarming rate across the globe, particularly around aquatic habitats. Natural and predictable light cycles dictate much of an individual organism's life by acting as a major signal for their circadian clock, driving rhythmic behaviours and physiological changes throughout the body. Light cycles also help populations coordinate group behaviour and greatly impact the interspecies dynamics of a community. Research into the ecological impacts of ALAN has highlighted numerous effects on these biological processes, including higher predation rates, impaired growth and development, and diminished reproductive success. Invertebrates play an undeniable role in ecosystem functioning and show robust daily rhythms. As such, it is vital to understand how ALAN may disrupt their behavioural patterns. The aim of this study was to monitor the impacts of increasing levels of light at night (0 lux - 80 lux), as well as constant light and constant darkness, on the behavioural rhythms of the intertidal amphipod, Marinogammarus marinus, and the freshwater species, Gammarus pulex. Gammarus pulex activity was not strongly synchronised to any of the light at night treatments. Marinogammarus marinus, however, exhibited strong behavioural rhythmicity in diurnal cycles with dark night periods. All the ALAN treatments resulted in a significant decrease in M. marinus rhythmicity and overall activity. Moreover, ALAN between 1-50 lux disrupted nocturnality in this species. These results indicate that while some amphipods show some adaptive plasticity when it comes to light pollution, others may experience strong direct impacts on their activity. This may be relevant to individual and population level fitness of vulnerable species in more heavily urbanised areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.