ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2025
Shared and unique therapeutic targets of KarXT and clozapine for schizophrenia treatment revealed by network pharmacology and molecular docking analyses: Implications for differential clinical responses.
Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of xanomeline-trospium on the gut-lung microbiota axis and susceptibility to LPS-induced acute lung injury in male and female mice.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Xanomeline plus trospium (KarXT) is a combination drug targeting muscarinic receptors with demonstrated efficacy against positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia, although therapeutic effects on positive and negative symptoms do not differ significantly from risperidone and olanzapine. Clozapine remains the most effective treatment for schizophrenia unresponsive to other antipsychotics and demonstrates superior efficacy for positive and negative symptoms compared to risperidone and olanzapine. However, the common and distinct molecular targets underlying these different clinical responses to KarXT and clozapine are not fully understood. Potential xanomeline and clozapine targets were identified by searching PharmMapper, SwissTargetPrediction, GeneCards, and SuperPred, and schizophrenia-related targets by searching GeneCards, OMIM, and TTD. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were constructed to identify hub targets, and GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were conducted for the top 25 targets using DAVID. Cytoscape was used to build a network linking drugs, pathways, targets, and disease. Molecular docking simulations were conducted to assess drug binding affinities to core targets. Combined database searches identified 103 overlapping targets for xanomeline and schizophrenia, and 285 overlapping targets for clozapine and schizophrenia. PPI network and KEGG pathway analyses identified FOS, CASP3, NFKB1, AKT1, IGF1, KDR, and CDC42, proteins related to apoptosis, inflammation, neuroprotection, and MAPK signaling, as core xanomeline targets, and FOS, CASP3, NFKB1, TNF, IL6, IFNG, and CXCL8, proteins involved in apoptosis, inflammation, immune responses, and IL-17 signaling, as core clozapine targets. Molecular docking confirmed strong binding between drugs and core targets. KarXT and clozapine share core targets FOS, CASP3, and NFKB1. Distinct KarXT targets such as AKT1, IGF1, KDR, and CDC42, and clozapine targets including TNF, IL6, IFNG, and CXCL8 may explain differences in therapeutic efficacy. These bioinformatics findings support recent meta-analyses and provide guidance for more appropriate drug selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.