ArticleScientific reports2025
Geometric principles of wobble board design for balance training and rehabilitation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Wobble-Board Dynamics Identify Individual Signatures of Balance Control for Clinical Assessment.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wobble boards-unstable platforms mounted on curved bases-are widely used for balance training and rehabilitation. However, their design lacks a systematic theoretical foundation, making it difficult to precisely tailor instability characteristics to specific neuromuscular demands. This study introduces a geometric framework for optimizing wobble board instability through controlled manipulation of base geometry. We derived exact relationships between the elliptical base's geometric parameters and the board's instability characteristics for the general case of a truncated elliptical base geometry. Our analysis reveals that the ratio between the vertical and horizontal semi-axes of the elliptical base plays a critical role in shaping stability properties. If this ratio exceeds a certain critical value-which can be precisely determined from the geometry-the board transitions into an unstable regime requiring rapid, reflexive postural responses. Conversely, ratios below this critical value enable more stable configurations that support larger, compensatory movements involving gross motor coordination. The absolute size of the elliptical base further modulates these effects by scaling the overall postural demand. Furthermore, we demonstrate that ground clearance (i.e., the vertical distance between the base's truncation and the ground) governs safety trade-offs by limiting the maximum tilt angle achievable before loss of stability. These results constitute theoretical predictions derived from geometric modeling that offer a structured basis for customizing instability in training or rehabilitation contexts, though their clinical relevance remains to be established through future empirical validation. By linking these parameters to postural demands, this framework provides clinicians and trainers with a structured, evidence-based method for designing, prescribing, and progressively adapting wobble boards to match individual skill levels and neuromuscular requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.