Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40775011›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A pharmacovigilance study of vortioxetine based on data from the FDA adverse event reporting system.

Miao Liu, Yang Xia, Wenwen Long, Xiaowen Han, Yu Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miao LiuDepartment of clinical laboratory, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, 621000, China.
Yang XiaMianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, 621000, China.
Wenwen LongDepartment of Pharmacy, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, 621000, China.
Xiaowen Han *Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, 621000, China. hanxiaowen1992@hotmail.com.
Yu Xiong *Department of Pharmacy, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, 621000, China. xiongyu9508@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vortioxetine is an antidepressant approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Given its widespread post-marketing clinical use, it is essential to explore its real-world safety. Reports were extracted from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the third quarter of 2013 to the first quarter of 2025. Four disproportionality analysis methods, commonly used in pharmacovigilance to evaluate the relative reporting frequency of adverse events (AEs), were employed to identify AE signals associated with vortioxetine. These included the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrink (MGPS), and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN). The median was used to describe the time to onset (TTO) of AEs, and Weibull distribution was employed to assess the trend of AE occurrence over time. In addition, sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the robustness of the findings. A total of 13,613 individual case safety reports (ICSRs) involving 34,156 AEs were analyzed. Females accounted for 60.9% of the reports, while males represented 26.5%. The median age of patients was 42 years (interquartile range: 26-59 years), with most cases (34.1%) in the 18-65 age group. The United States contributed the highest proportion of reports (77.4%). Common AEs included nausea (n = 2042, ROR = 5.11, PRR = 4.86, EBGM = 4.85, IC = 2.28), anxiety (n = 781, ROR = 5.3, PRR = 5.2, EBGM = 5.18, IC = 2.37 ), vomiting (n = 773, ROR = 3.23, PRR = 3.17, EBGM = 3.17, IC = 1.66), headache (n = 670, ROR = 1.96, PRR = 1.94, EBGM = 1.94, IC = 0.96), and somnolence (n = 212, ROR = 2, PRR = 1.99, EBGM = 1.99, IC = 0.99). Notably, several AEs not listed on the drug label, such as tinnitus (n = 79, ROR = 3.24, PRR = 3.24, EBGM = 3.23, IC = 1.69), urinary retention (n = 62, ROR = 3.57, PRR = 3.57, EBGM = 3.56, IC = 1.83), prolonged QT interval (n = 62, ROR = 3.14, PRR = 3.13, EBGM = 3.13, IC = 1.64), and restless legs syndrome (n = 48, ROR = 5.08, PRR = 5.08, EBGM = 5.06, IC = 2.34) were also identified. Most AEs occurred within the first month of treatment, with a median onset time of 15 days. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the consistency of these findings. This study provides new insights into the safety of vortioxetine and offers preliminary safety evidence. In addition, the findings may inform updates to prescribing information and guide post-marketing safety surveillance. However, the spontaneous nature of the FAERS database precludes establishing a causal relationship between vortioxetine and the reported AEs. Further prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAntidepressive AgentsPharmacovigilanceVortioxetineAdolescentAdultAgedDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationYoung AdultAntidepressive AgentsVortioxetineAdverse eventsDisproportionality analysisFAERSPharmacovigilanceVortioxetine

Identifiers

PMID40775011
PMCPMC12332032

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.