ArticleDiabetologia2025
Adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes are associated with multiple alterations in the vaginal microbiome.
Article in Diabetologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gardnerella enrichment in the vaginal microbiome of women with gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with lower fetal birthweight percentiles.Diabetologia · 2026Observational
- Distinct vaginal microbial signatures in pregnancies complicated by antiphospholipid syndrome: depletion ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Control of HELLP syndrome and pre-eclampsia with microbiota.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Characteristics in the uterine cavity microbiota of infertile women with hydrosalpinx or endometrial polyps revealed by shotgun metagenomics.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aims/hypothesisThe vaginal microbiome has been linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes, which are markedly increased in women with type 1 diabetes. To investigate this relationship, we profiled the vaginal microbiome in pregnant women with and without type 1 diabetes, and in relation to pre-term birth (PTB) and pre-eclampsia (PE) in women with type 1 diabetes.
methodsBacterial and fungal microbiomes were analysed by 16S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer 1 sequencing, respectively, in the third trimester of 310 pregnancies (160 with type 1 diabetes) for bacteria, and 147 pregnancies (70 with type 1 diabetes) for fungi.
resultsThe vaginal microbiome was altered by type 1 diabetes in pregnancy, with an increase in the bacterial species Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus jensenii, and in the anaerobic genera Gardnerella, Anaerococcus, Prevotella, Dialister, Peptoniphilus and others that are associated with vaginal dysbiosis. In addition, the abundance of the fungal species Malassezia restricta was increased in women with type 1 diabetes. These changes were associated with increased risks of PTB and PE. PTB was associated with higher bacterial alpha diversity, decreased abundance of Lactobacillus reuteri, and increased abundance of Malassezia fungal genus, family Malasseziaceae and order Malasseziales. PE was associated with higher bacterial alpha diversity, increased abundance of Gardnerella vaginalis and decreased abundance of Candida albicans. CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationAdverse pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes are reflected by distinct changes in the vaginal microbiome. This highlights the importance of monitoring and managing the vaginal microbiome in high-risk pregnancies, particularly those complicated by type 1 diabetes. Early detection and treatment of risk-associated taxa, e.g. G. vaginalis in the case of PE, could potentially improve vaginal health and pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.