SynthesisEuropean journal of medical research2025
Tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Safety and efficacy of intravenous tenecteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the extended time window: an updated meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of intravenous tenecteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke in extended time window: systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of different doses of intravenous thrombolytics in acute ischemic stroke: a GRADE-assessed network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis with Tenecteplase in Patients with Wake-Up Branch Atheromatous Disease.Translational stroke research · 2026Article
- Tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Extracellular Vesicles as Therapeutic Strategy for Ischemic Stroke.Journal of neurochemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStroke was the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of disability worldwide in 2019. Alteplase is an FDA-approved medication for the treatment of patients with ischemic stroke within 4.5 h. However, Tenecteplase is an alternative. We aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and the best dose of tenecteplase vs alteplase. METHODOLOGY: We followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library until November 2024. We included RCTs that compared tenecteplase with alteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients within 4.5 h of onset. Relative risk, 95% CI, and random effects models were used. Our primary endpoints were excellent functional outcomes and mortality. An excellent functional outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Score of 0-1 at 90 days. The Risk of Bias 2 tool from Cochrane was used to assess the quality of the studies.
resultsThirteen RCTs met our inclusion criteria, including 9053 patients, 4416 of whom had tenecteplase. Six studies showed a low risk of bias, and the other 7 had some concerns either in their randomization process or in the deviation from the intended intervention. Tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg had a significantly better performance in achieving excellent functional outcomes (p value 0.008), but no difference was observed in mortality rates (P value 0.37). On the other hand, no difference was observed in comparing either TNK 0.1 mg/kg or TNK 0.4 mg/kg versus alteplase in the reported outcomes. A meta-regression revealed that a reduction in the baseline NIHSS score had a significant effect on favorable functional outcomes (P value 0.025). Sensitivity analysis for outcomes comparing either TNK 0.25 mg/kg and TNK 0.1 mg/kg versus alteplase showed that no single study removal affected the significance of the study, while Kvistad 2022 and Logallo 2017 removal changed the significance of outcomes comparing TNK 0.4 mg/kg versus alteplase.
conclusionWhen compared with alteplase, 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase is superior for achieving excellent functional outcomes and is not inferior in terms of major neurological improvement or death rates. TNKs at 0.25 mg/kg appear to be the optimal dose and a desirable alternative to alteplase. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024596896.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.