ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025
Utilization of acute medical services in general practice: a retrospective routine data analysis.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [A primary care system in Germany: evidence, opportunities, and implementation].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Review
- Urgent care utilization patterns in Switzerland: a population-based cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing utilization of emergency departments by patients with acute but non-emergency medical needs contributes to overcrowding in emergency care. Previous research has mainly focused on hospitals and out-of-hours care centres. The role of general practitioners providing primary care during office hours for emergency and acutely ill patients has not yet been considered intensively. This analysis aimed to quantify and describe the documented outpatient utilization behaviour of patients with acute care needs in primary care practices during office hours.
methodsThe retrospective cohort study used routine data from 16 German primary care practices in 2022 and 2023 from the Supraregional Health Service Research Network. Acute care cases were identified as consultations without a prior appointment or those with a same-day appointment. Statistical analyses included bivariate and multivariate analyses.
resultsA total of 873,732 consultations involving 90,020 patients were analysed. When considering only the first visit of an acute episode, 60.6% of cases were classified as acute. Patients seeking acute care were younger (51.9 vs. 58.3 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to visit the practice on Mondays (Odds Ratio: 1.48, p < 0.001) or at the weekend (Odds Ratio: 13.91, p < 0.001). Nonspecific health factors, respiratory-, musculoskeletal- and cardiovascular reasons for encounter dominated. The majority of acute cases (80%) did not seek any further health service on the same day, while approximately 19% of patients were referred to a specialist and 3% were admitted to a hospital within 14 days.
conclusionThe effective management of acute cases by primary care practices highlights the potential for strengthening this sector to enhance the quality and efficiency of emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.