Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40775787›Full record

ReviewVeterinary research2025

Recent advances in nanogels in veterinary medicine.

Maria Laura Soriano Pérez, Maria Carolina Flores Bracamonte, Romina Bellingeri, Fabrisio Alustiza, Maria Molina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria Laura Soriano Pérez *Grupo Sanidad Animal, INTA Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, Argentina.
Maria Carolina Flores Bracamonte *Instituto de Investigaciones en Tecnologías Energéticas y Materiales Avanzados (IITEMA), Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto (UNRC) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina.
Romina BellingeriInstituto de Investigaciones en Tecnologías Energéticas y Materiales Avanzados (IITEMA), Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto (UNRC) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina.
Fabrisio AlustizaGrupo Sanidad Animal, INTA Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, Argentina.
Maria MolinaInstituto de Investigaciones en Tecnologías Energéticas y Materiales Avanzados (IITEMA), Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto (UNRC) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina. mmolina@exa.unrc.edu.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6139-6633

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanogels, a promising class of nanomaterials, have emerged as versatile platforms in veterinary medicine and have shown substantial progress in recent years. This review outlines the key developments and potential applications of nanogels in veterinary therapeutics. It provides an in-depth discussion of critical factors influencing nanogel implementation, including synthesis, biocompatibility, biodegradability, clinical translation, and technological considerations. Approaches to nanogel-based vaccines and drug-delivery systems are examined, with particular emphasis on the mucosal route of administration, given its relevance in livestock. Finally, the integration of nanogels into the One Health framework is considered.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsNanogelsVeterinary MedicineAnimalsVaccinesNanogelsVaccinesmastitismucosal administrationNanogelsOne Healthvaccines

Identifiers

PMID40775787
PMCPMC12333112

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.