ArticleRenal failure2025
Assessing genetic causal relationship between milk fat content and chronic kidney disease: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Renal failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the genetic causal relationship between milk fat content and chronic kidney disease (CKD) using publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) data. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly associated with milk fat content were identified following rigorous quality control procedures. A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach was used to analyze the relationship between three milk fat levels and CKD risk. The inverse variance weighting (IVW) method with random effects served as the primary analysis, supported by MR-Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode methods. Sensitivity analyses, including Cochran's Q tests and MR-Egger intercepts, were conducted to assess heterogeneity and pleiotropy. A leave-one-out analysis tested the influence of individual SNPs on the causal estimates. Additional validation using maximum likelihood, penalized weighted median, and IVW with fixed effects further supported result consistency. The IVW results revealed no clear evidence of a causal link between milk fat content and CKD risk, a finding echoed by the other MR methods. Minimal heterogeneity was observed. Overall, the study suggests no significant genetic causal association between milk fat intake and CKD, offering valuable insights into the genetic epidemiology of CKD. Notably, genetic instruments derived from self-reported "milk type" may reflect broader dietary habits or cultural factors-such as lactose tolerance-rather than precise fat consumption levels, which may influence interpretations of causality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.