ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Towards an Informed Choice of Diffusion MRI Image Contrasts for Cerebellar Segmentation.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anatomically constrained and curated cerebellar tractography (ACCURAT): an open framework and a pathway-specific neuroanatomical reference.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Towards an Informed Choice of Diffusion MRI Image Contrasts for Cerebellar Segmentation.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The fine-grained segmentation of cerebellar structures is an essential step towards supplying increasingly accurate anatomically informed analyses, including, for example, white matter diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tractography. Cerebellar tissue segmentation is typically performed on structural MRI data, such as T1-weighted data, while connectivity between segmented regions is mapped using diffusion MRI tractography data. Small deviations in structural to diffusion MRI data co-registration may negatively impact connectivity analyses. Reliable segmentation of brain tissue performed directly on diffusion MRI data helps to circumvent such inaccuracies. Diffusion MRI enables the computation of many image contrasts, including a variety of tissue microstructure maps. While multiple methods have been proposed for the segmentation of cerebellar structures using diffusion MRI, little attention has been paid to the systematic evaluation of the performance of different available input image contrasts for the segmentation task. In this work, we evaluate and compare the segmentation performance of diffusion MRI-derived contrasts on the cerebellar segmentation task. Specifically, we include spherical mean (diffusion-weighted image average) and b0 (non-diffusion-weighted image average) contrasts, local signal parameterization contrasts (diffusion tensor and kurtosis fit maps), and the structural T1-weighted MRI contrast that is most commonly employed for the task. We train a popular deep-learning architecture using a publicly available dataset (HCP-YA) on a set of cerebellar white and gray matter region labels obtained from the atlas-based SUIT cerebellar segmentation pipeline employing T1-weighted data. By training and testing using many diffusion-MRI-derived image inputs, we find that the spherical mean image computed from b = 1000 s/mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.