ArticleCurrent neuropharmacology2026
Daridorexant and Insomnia in Clinical Practice: A Nominal Group Technique Consensus Study among Italian Sleep and Insomnia Experts.
Article in Current neuropharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChronic insomnia disorder significantly affects cognitive, emotional, and physical health. Recently, the dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) daridorexant was approved for treating chronic insomnia in several countries. Given the limited evidence available, expert consensus was sought to clarify key clinical issues, inform practice, and guide future research.
methodsThirteen Italian sleep experts employed the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) to identify and rank important clinical questions. The process involved independent thought generation, group discussion, and online voting using a 5-point Likert scale.
resultsThe NGT process resulted in 55 statements across five key clinical questions, with relevance scores guiding their categorization into three tiers. Key findings highlight daridorexant's mechanism of action, safety profile, efficacy on night and day parameters, and suitability for long-term use. The experts emphasized cross-tapering strategies for switching from other hypnotics, the importance of sleep psychoeducation, and using the Insomnia Severity Index and sleep diaries for treatment evaluation. DISCUSSION: Daridorexant may address insomnia without increasing sedation via its dual orexin receptor antagonism. Daridorexant seems to be effective and safe even in special patient populations, such as the elderly and those with comorbid conditions (neurodegenerative disorders and cognitive impairment, comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea, psychiatric conditions and mood disorders, epilepsy, and restless leg syndrome), thus representing a new, promising option for insomnia treatment.
conclusionThe expert consensus provides a comprehensive framework for daridorexant clinical application, advocating for further research to expand the evidence base and refine best practices, as well as underscoring the importance of a multidisciplinary approach that combines both pharmacological and psychosocial interventions to optimize outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.