ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
The application of artificial intelligence in forensic pathology: a systematic literature review.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative artificial intelligence in forensic science education: Student perspectives on AI-supported crime scene decision-making.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Article
- Temporal Reproducibility of Fracture Interpretation in Forensic Radiography: A Multispecialty Comparison of Physicians and Vision Language Models Including Fracture Subtype Description.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Autopsy Pathology's Paradigm Shift: Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies in the Era of Digitally Integrated Death Investigation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From forensic 3D avatars to courtroom-grade digital twins: the next translational step for AI-assisted injury documentation.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence have shown immense potential across various domains of healthcare, including forensic pathology. This systematic review aims to evaluate the latest innovations brought by Artificial Intelligence in forensic pathology and provide insights into future directions in this evolving field. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using databases for papers published from 1990 to 2025. The search strategy combined terms related to artificial intelligence, forensic odontology, forensic psychiatry and forensic medicine/pathology. Following PRISMA guidelines, 65 articles were initially identified, of which 18 met the inclusion criteria after applying exclusion criteria. Results: Artificial Intelligence applications demonstrated significant success across multiple forensic domains. In post-mortem analysis, deep learning achieved 70-94% accuracy in neurological forensics. Wound analysis systems showed high accuracy rates (87.99-98%) in gunshot wound classification. Artificial Intelligence-enhanced diatom testing for drowning cases achieved precision scores of 0.9 and recall scores of 0.95. Microbiome analysis applications reached accuracy rates up to 90% for individual identification and geographical origin determination. AI shows promise in forensic age estimation, psychiatric risk assessment, and insanity evaluations. Discussion: While Artificial Intelligence shows promise as a supportive tool in forensic pathology, several limitations persist, including small sample sizes and variable performance across different applications. Artificial Intelligence serves best as an enhancement rather than a replacement for human expertise. Future development should focus on larger datasets, specialized systems for different forensic applications, and improved interpretability of Artificial Intelligence decisions for legal contexts. The integration of Artificial Intelligence in forensic pathology represents a significant advancement, requiring careful balance between technological innovation and human expertise for optimal implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.