SynthesisReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Incident Arrhythmias Detected Using Implantable Loop Recorders in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea.
Synthesis in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electrocardiographic Alterations in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is highly prevalent in Western populations, causing breathing cessation during sleep due to airway collapse. OSA is strongly associated with cardiovascular disease and arrhythmia, with several mechanisms likely to increase arrhythmia incidence. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the mainstay of treatment, and whilst CPAP effectively treats OSA, specific arrhythmias and major adverse cardiovascular events may remain unchanged. Furthermore, arrhythmias are likely significantly underdiagnosed in this population. Meanwhile, implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are the gold-standard detection method for arrhythmias. Methods: This review aimed to systematically evaluate observational studies using ILRs to identify the incidence of arrhythmia in treated OSA patients. We searched the Medline/Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) databases, identifying observational studies involving any OSA patients with no history of arrhythmia and who had ILRs inserted. Two reviewers assessed the quality of the studies and potential bias using the Observational Study Quality Evaluation (OSQE) tool. Results: Three studies met the criteria with 77 participants; however, the study outcomes were incomparable and could not be pooled. CPAP significantly reduced bradyarrhythmia/pauses. There was a high incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF), up to 31%, although the sample size and overall characteristics were insufficient and could not be generalized. AF and other tachyarrhythmias were likely underdiagnosed in OSA patients. CPAP did reduce bradyarrhythmia/pauses but is potentially insufficient to reduce AF or other tachyarrhythmias. Only one ongoing study was found to evaluate the incidence of arrhythmias in OSA. Conclusions: We highlight the need for arrhythmia screening in OSA patients and for further studies to clarify the true incidence of arrhythmias in OSA patients. These additional studies may influence the guidelines for arrhythmia screening and identify mechanisms and therapeutic targets in OSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.