Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40776963›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025

Artificial Intelligence-based Approaches for Characterizing Plaque Components From Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging: Integration Into Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Michela Sperti, Camilla Cardaci, Francesco Bruno, Syed Taimoor Hussain Shah, Konstantinos Panagiotopoulos, Karim Kassem, Giuseppe De Nisco, Umberto Morbiducci, Raffaele Piccolo, Francesco Burzotta and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Coronary Slow Flow and No-Reflow During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Contemporary Insights Into Imaging-Guided Prediction, Prevention, and Management.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Michela SpertiDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Polito Med Lab, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0756-8523
Camilla CardaciDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Polito Med Lab, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5474-024X
Francesco BrunoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0019-0273
Syed Taimoor Hussain ShahDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Polito Med Lab, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6010-6777
Konstantinos PanagiotopoulosDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Polito Med Lab, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5034-378X
Karim KassemDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Polito Med Lab, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9212-7437
Giuseppe De NiscoDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Polito Med Lab, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1711-3047
Umberto MorbiducciDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Polito Med Lab, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9854-1619
Raffaele PiccoloDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3124-9912
Francesco BurzottaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6569-9401
Fabrizio D'AscenzoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6646-9317
Marco Agostino DeriuDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Polito Med Lab, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1918-1772
Claudio ChiastraDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Polito Med Lab, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2070-6142

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) is emerging as an effective imaging technique for accurately characterizing coronary atherosclerotic plaques. This technique provides detailed information on plaque morphology and composition, enabling the identification of high-risk features associated with coronary artery disease and adverse cardiovascular events. However, despite advancements in imaging technology and image assessment, the adoption of IVOCT in clinical practice remains limited. Manual plaque assessment by experts is time-consuming, prone to errors, and affected by high inter-observer variability. To increase productivity, precision, and reproducibility, researchers are increasingly integrating artificial intelligence (AI)-based techniques into IVOCT analysis pipelines. Machine learning algorithms, trained on labelled datasets, have demonstrated robust classification of various plaque types. Deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks, further improve performance by enabling automatic feature extraction. This reduces the reliance on predefined criteria, which often require domain-specific expertise, and allow for more flexible and comprehensive plaque characterization. AI-driven approaches aim to facilitate the integration of IVOCT into routine clinical practice, potentially transforming this technique from a research tool into a powerful aid for clinical decision-making. This narrative review aims to (i) provide a comprehensive overview of AI-based methods for analyzing IVOCT images of coronary arteries, with a focus on plaque characterization, and (ii) explore the clinical translation of AI to IVOCT, highlighting AI-powered tools for plaque characterization currently intended for commercial and/or clinical use. While these technologies represent significant progress, current solutions remain limited in the range of plaque features these methods can assess. Additionally, many of these solutions are confined to specific regulatory or research settings. Therefore, this review highlights the need for further advancements in AI-based IVOCT analysis, emphasizing the importance of additional validation and improved integration with clinical systems to enhance plaque characterization, support clinical decision-making, and advance risk prediction.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceatherosclerotic plaqueautomated plaque characterizationclinical decision support systemsdeep learningintravascular imagingmachine learningoptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID40776963
PMCPMC12326455

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.