ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025
Medical Education Strategies for Otolaryngology in the Online World and the Role of Podcasting.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Medical Education Strategies for Otolaryngology in the Online World and the Role of Podcasting.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigates the evolution of educational practices among otolaryngologists (ENTs) in the United States over the past decade, emphasizing podcast use. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed. Initially, a 20-question quantitative survey identified trends in educational resources and outcomes, specifically evaluating the BackTable ENT podcast's influence on clinical practice, patient outcomes, and knowledge acquisition. Subsequently, semi-structured qualitative interviews explored ENT specialists' experiences with educational resources, continuous learning challenges, motivations for podcast usage, and perspectives on future educational directions. Qualitative data underwent thematic analysis following COREQ guidelines. Results: Among 151 survey respondents, predominantly aged 31-50 (66%), male (57%), and affiliated with academic institutions (64%), the most frequently used educational resources in daily practice were internet searches (90%), journal articles (87%), surgical videos (62%), and podcasts (56%). Textbook usage significantly declined from 94% to 48% over the past 10 years ( Conclusion: Podcasts significantly enrich ENT education. Future strategies should balance traditional and innovative resources to sustain comprehensive foundational knowledge and ultimately enhance patient care outcomes.Level of Evidence: 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.