ArticleAfrican health sciences2024
Women's fertility and vitamin D: Could hypovitaminosis D biomarkers correlate with the disease, and explain the unexplained female factor infertility?
Article in African health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Circadian-Light-Hygiene Hypothesis: A Potential Modulator of Fertility and Birthrate Trends.Biology · 2026Review
- Endocrine roles of vitamin D in female reproduction: Mechanisms and clinical implications.Women's health (London, England)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Vitamin D (Vit D) deficiency correlates women reproductive pathophysiology. We analyzed Vit D deficiency biomarkers in infertile women. Patients & method: This case-control study enrolled 80 infertile women polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and other etiologies; anovulation and unexplained and 25 controls. Serum calcidiol and calcitriol were determined by ELISA and their direct ratio was calculated. Results: 72% of controls and 92.5% of patients had Vit D deficiency/insufficiency (calcidiol mean ± SDM of 33.50±22.10 vs. 20.26±5.226 ng/mL and an AUC of 0.808±0.048). Calcitriol had an AUC of 0.909±0.031 that more effectively distinguished patients and etiologies (53.49±23.30 pg/mL) from controls (114.0±43.20 pg/mL; P<0.001). 4 other etiology cases and 17 controls had calcitriol levels ≥100 pg/mL. 64% of controls (4.090±0.020) and 16.25% of patients [2.634±0.855, P<0.04; 5 PCOS (3 primary/2 secondary), 3 secondary unexplained, and 5 others (one primary tubal, one primary/one secondary peritoneal, one primary/one cervical and one primary tubal had a normal ratio ≥3.333 at an AUC of 0.740±0.065. All biomarkers revealed patient levels ~50% lower than controls; lowest in PCOS and unexplained etiologies. Conclusion: Vit D levels are significantly reduced in infertile women; lowest in PCOS and unexplained etiology, for all biomarkers, where calcitriol was the optimal predictor of both infertility and etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.