Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778211›Full record

ArticleJHLT open2025

Impella 5.5 use in women: A multicenter study.

Michaela Asher, David Rekhtman, Amit Iyengar, John DePaolo, Cindy Song, Iris Feng, Emma Morganroth, Gabriel Dardik, Max Shin, Noah Weingarten and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Michaela AsherPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
David RekhtmanPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Amit IyengarDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
John DePaoloDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Cindy SongPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Iris FengColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Emma MorganrothPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gabriel DardikColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Max ShinDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Noah WeingartenDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Alyson BrownDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Joyce WaldDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mauer BiscottiDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Koji TakedaDivision of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Marisa CevascoDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We sought to compare the outcomes of Impella 5.5 use between sexes. Methods: All adult patients who underwent Impella 5.5 implantation at the University of Pennsylvania and Columbia University between June 2020 and May 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, baseline status, complications, and outcomes were compared between sexes. Laboratory values were examined with a linear mixed model, and a parsimonious multivariable logistic regression was developed to assess factors predictive of in-hospital mortality. Results: Of 254 patients, 41 (16%) were female and 213 (84%) were male. Before implant, females had lower hemoglobin levels (9.6 vs 11.2 g/dl, Conclusions: Females do not experience increased complications from the Impella 5.5, nor reduced device biocompatibility. Our data support greater consideration of device use in females.

Indexed as

heart failureImpellamechanical circulatory supporttransplant

Identifiers

PMID40778211
PMCPMC12329075

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.