Evidence mapPaperPMID 40778279Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Comparative effectiveness of different exercise modality on glycaemic control and lipid profile for prediabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Ruixiang Yan, Lunxin Chen, Gesheng Lin, Yuer Shi, Wenrui Huang, Yuqiang Mai, Jian Sun, Duanying Li

Abstract readComparative StudyNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruixiang YanSchool of Athletic Training, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Lunxin ChenSchool of Physical Education and Sport, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China.
Gesheng LinSchool of Athletic Training, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuer ShiSchool of Athletic Training, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenrui HuangThe Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yuqiang MaiSchool of Wushu, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Jian SunSchool of Athletic Training, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Duanying LiSchool of Athletic Training, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prediabetes is the precursor to type 2 diabetes and represents a critical, reversible window for intervention. This study aims to systematically review and conduct a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of aerobic training (AT), resistance training (RT), combined training (AT+RT), high-intensity interval training (HIIT), and traditional Chinese exercises (TCEs) on glycemic control, lipid profile, and weight management in prediabetic individuals. This marks the first time HIIT and TCEs have been included in such an assessment. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane (CENTRAL), Embase, CNKI, and WangFang Data for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of different exercise modalities on prediabetic patients published up to August 10, 2024. Network meta-analysis was performed using the "gemtc" package in R software, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the CINeMA framework. Results: A total of 74 studies involving 5,683 participants were included. The network meta-analysis results showed that HIIT was the most effective for reducing haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (-0.44%, 95% CI: -0.55% to -0.32%, SUCRA 93.8%), 2-hour plasma glucose (2hPG) (-1.3, 95% CI: -1.6 to -0.93, SUCRA 84.3%), and increasing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (0.20, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.36, SUCRA 87.3%). AT+RT was most effective in reducing total cholesterol (TC) (-0.46, 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.32, SUCRA 98.3%), TG (-0.55, 95% CI: -0.69 to -0.42, SUCRA 99.9%), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (-0.35, 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.18, SUCRA 82.2%), and body mass index (BMI) (-0.89, 95% CI: -1.6 to -0.14, SUCRA 66.4%). TCEs showed the most significant improvements in reducing 2hPG (-1.3, 95% CI: -1.5 to -1.0, SUCRA 83.5%), body weight (BW) (-3.4, 95% CI: -6.4 to -0.51, SUCRA 79.1%), and wasit circumference (WC) (-4.27, 95% CI: -7.53 to -0.98, SUCRA 84.6%). Conclusion: Various exercise interventions significantly improved glycemic and lipid profiles in prediabetic patients. HIIT and AT+RT were found to be the most effective interventions. For elderly individuals with limited physical activity or chronic conditions, TCEs can serve as a gentle and safe alternative. These findings provide the latest evidence to support exercise interventions for managing prediabetes. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024578405.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseExerciseExercise TherapyGlycemic ControlLipidsPrediabetic StateGlycated HemoglobinHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansResistance TrainingBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinLipidsexerciseglycaemiclipid profileprediabetesweight

Identifiers

PMID40778279
PMCPMC12328182

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.